Back

Evaluating the potential benefits and pitfalls of combining protein and expression quantitative trait loci in evidencing drug targets

Robinson, J. W.; Battram, T.; Baird, D. A.; Haycock, P.; Zheng, J.; Hemani, G.; Chen, C.-Y.; Gaunt, T. R.

2022-03-17 genetics
10.1101/2022.03.15.484248 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Molecular quantitative trait loci (molQTL), which can provide functional evidence on the mechanisms underlying phenotype-genotype associations, are increasingly used in drug target validation and safety assessment. In particular, protein abundance QTLs (pQTLs) and gene expression QTLs (eQTLs) are the most commonly used for this purpose. However, questions remain on how to best consolidate results from pQTLs and eQTLs for target validation. In this study, we combined blood cell-derived eQTLs and plasma-derived pQTLs to form QTL pairs representing each gene and its product. We performed a series of enrichment analyses to identify features of QTL pairs that provide consistent evidence for drug targets based on the concordance of the direction of effect of the pQTL and eQTL. We repeated these analyses using eQTLs derived in 49 tissues. We found that 25-30% of blood-cell derived QTL pairs have discordant effects. The difference in tissues of origin for molecular markers contributes to, but is not likely a major source of, this observed discordance. Finally, druggable genes were as likely to have discordant QTL pairs as concordant. Our analyses suggest combining and consolidating evidence from pQTLs and eQTLs for drug target validation is crucial and should be done whenever possible, as many potential drug targets show discordance between the two molecular phenotypes that could be misleading if only one is considered. We also encourage investigating QTL tissue-specificity in target validation applications to help identify reasons for discordance and emphasise that concordance and discordance of QTL pairs across tissues are both informative in target validation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.4%
4
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.8%
8
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
10
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
12
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
16
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
18
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
21
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Database
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
26
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
28
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%