Back

miR319-targeted TCP4/LANCEOLATE directly regulates OVATE and auxin responses to modulate tomato gynoecium patterning and fruit morphology

Carvalho, A.; Vicente, M. H.; Ferigolo, L. F.; Silva, E. M.; Levy, M.; Peres, L.; Sablowski, R.; Schommer, C.; Ori, N.; Nogueira, F. T.

2022-03-16 plant biology
10.1101/2022.03.15.484181 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Diversity in fruit morphology is one of the hallmarks of varietal differences among modern cultivars of fruit-bearing crops. As evolutionarily related organs, fruits and leaves share developmental processes, but there are surprisingly few connections between regulatory pathways for fruit and leaf development. Here, we show the regulation of the leaf development-associated TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PCF (TCP) TCP4/LANCEOLATE (TCP4/LA) transcription factor by the microRNA319 (miR319) is crucial for gynoecium patterning and establishment of fruit morphology. Loss of miR319 regulation leads to a premature, ectopic TCP4/LA expression during gynoecium patterning, which results in elongated fruits, resembling ovate mutants. TCP4/LA modulates tomato fruit development and morphology partially by directly repressing OVATE expression as early as 5-8 days post-inflorescence (dpi) flower buds. Furthermore, miR319-targeted CINCINNATA-like TCP4/LANCEOLATE controls auxin responses in developing flower buds by directly binding to the SlYUCCA4 promoter. Modulation of auxin biosynthesis by TCP4/LA is shared with other CINCINNATA-like TCPs during Arabidopsis gynoecium patterning. Our study defines a novel miRNA-based molecular link between OVATE, a fundamental gene associated with tomato domestication, and auxin responses in the control of fruit development and morphology. Given the striking variation in fruit shape among members of the Solanaceae family, fine-tuning regulation of gene expression by miRNA coupled with modulation of hormone dynamics may be a common driver in the evolution of fruit-shape diversity.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.