Back

Like host, like parasite: intraspecific divergence in a polystomatid flatworm parasite across South Africa echoes that of its frog host

Schoeman, A. L.; Kmentova, N.; Vanhove, M. P. M.; du Preez, L. H.

2022-03-18 zoology
10.1101/2022.03.15.483565 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The African Clawed Frog Xenopus laevis, a global invader, exhibits marked phylogeographic divergence among native populations in southern Africa, which enhances its invasive potential. The polystomatid flatworm Protopolystoma xenopodis, as the frogs most frequently co-introduced metazoan parasite, may be the ideal biological tag for the frogs movement, if corresponding divergence can be demonstrated. In an integrative approach, we utilised morphometrics and molecular markers to assess divergence in P. xenopodis in its native range. We measured twelve key morphological characters from 23 flatworms and compared these statistically between flatworms collected to the north and south of the Great Escarpment Mountain Range in South Africa. Phylogenetic analyses were based on three concatenated markers, namely 28S and 12S rDNA and COX1, from six flatworms. The combination of five morphological characters, which involve egg size, gut morphology and size of the attachment hooks, differentiated northern and southern populations of P. xenopodis in South Africa. The multilocus phylogenetic analyses supported these findings, showing a well-supported cluster of northern P. xenopodis. These findings suggest that taxonomic studies of polystomatid flatworms should make use of geographically representative data sets that consider both morphological and molecular evidence. Moreover, the findings demonstrate that the frog host and flatworm parasite exhibit corresponding phylogeographic structuring in the native range. Consequently, the phylogeography of P. xenopodis, both in the native and invasive range of its host, may act as a key piece of evidence to reconstruct past invasion pathways of X. laevis.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
3
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.6%
4
International Journal for Parasitology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
6
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
7
Parasitology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
9
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
12
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
14
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
17
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Journal of Anatomy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
The Anatomical Record
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Systematic Entomology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
24
Primates
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
25
Zootaxa
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
26
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
28
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
30
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%