Back

Concurrent separation of phase-locked and non-phase-locked activity

Singhal, S.; Ghosh, P.; Kumar, N.; Banerjee, A.

2022-03-16 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.03.14.484222 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Brain dynamics recorded via electroencephalography (EEG) is conceptualized as a sum of two components, "phase-locked" and "non-phase-locked" to the stimulus. Both activities are understood to be stemming from different neuronal mechanisms and hence accurately characterizing them is of immense importance in neuroscientific studies. Here, we discuss the drawbacks of currently used methods to separate the phase-locked and non-phase-locked activity and propose a new method that decomposes the two components simultaneously. First, we demonstrate that single-trial separation of phase-locked and non-phase-locked power is an ill-posed problem. Second, using simulations where ground truth validation is possible, we elucidate the drawbacks of the widely used averaging method and efficacy of the proposed concurrent phaser method (CPM). Using two experimental datasets, audio oddball EEG data and auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) we show how the empirical signal-to-noise estimates warrant the usage of CPM to separate phase-locked and non-phase-locked activity.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.