Back

Prospectively validated disease-agnostic predictive medicine with hybrid AI

Lovetrue, B.; Lovetrue, I.

2022-03-17 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2022.03.14.22272372 medRxiv
Show abstract

Standalone artificial intelligence has not alleviated the long-term bottleneck of linearly extracting new knowledge from exponentially growing biological data, which has severely limited clinical success rates for drug discovery. We developed a virtual patient augmented intelligence model that functionally reconstructed human physiology and human pathogenesis for high-fidelity simulations of drug-body interactions. We examined the clinical utility of virtual patient in prospective predictions of clinical efficacy and safety of novel therapeutics regardless of prior clinical data availability, through a 24- month, public, prospective, large-scale, unbiased, and real-world validation study. Virtual patient achieved 90.1% sensitivity and 82.0% precision with a 99% confidence across all major therapeutic areas, representing its capability of discovering 90.1% of all possible drug-indication pairs that could bring clinical benefits to patients, and its potential of increasing tenfold the baseline clinical success rate from 7.9% to 82.0%. Virtual patient represents a methodological shift of drug discovery especially for age-related diseases by doing away with animal experiments whose data are hard to reproduce, virtualizing human trials whose outcomes are doomed to failure, initiating human trials whose participants are likely to benefit, and reducing R&D cycles and costs while increasing clinical efficacy and safety. One-Sentence SummaryA prospectively validated virtual patient achieved a 10.4-fold improvement in the clinical success rate for new drugs across all major diseases with 99% confidence.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.