Surveillance of COVID-19 cases associated with dental settings using routine health data from the East of Scotland with a description of efforts to break chains of transmission from October 2020 to December 2021.
Mc Goldrick, N.; O'Keefe, E.
Show abstract
IntroductionDental settings have been considered high risk setting s for COVID-19. A Dental Public Health Team in South East Scotland have worked to risk assess the situation timeously to break chains of transmission. AimTo present routine data produced from a contact tracing service for COVID-19 cases in the dental setting with a focus on transmission. DesignObservational retrospective analysis of a routine data set of COVID-19 cases associated with a dental setting reported via the national contact tracing system for two health board areas in the east of Scotland. MethodsCOVID-19 cases were confirmed by PCR testing. Descriptive statistics are used to summarise the data collected over a 13-month period (Oct 2020-Dec 2021). A narrative presents themes identified during contact tracing that led to transmission within a dental setting and includes a case study. ResultsA total of 811 incidents are included. No evidence of staff to patient transmission or vice versa was found in this study. Staff to staff transmission occurred in non-clinical areas contributing to 33% of total staff cases. ConclusionTransmission of COVID-19 in a dental setting in the context of this study appears to be confined to non-clinical areas. Future pandemic plans should include tools to aid with implementation of guidance in non-clinical areas. In brief pointsO_LIOutbreaks of COVID-19 in a dental setting appear to be confined to the non-clinical areas of dental practices. C_LIO_LIWe have found no evidence of staff to patient transmission or vice versa using our contact tracing methods. C_LIO_LIFuture pandemic preparedness would benefit from including current quality improvement tools to aid with implementation of new standard operating procedures and other regularly changing guidance. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Virucidal activity of CPC-containing oral rinses against SARS-CoV-2 variants and are active in the presence of human saliva 89%
- The acceptability of testing contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases using serial, self-administered lateral flow devices as an alternative to self-isolation 87%
- Use of a corneal impression membrane for the detection of Herpes Simplex Virus type-1 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Comparison of Aerosol Mitigation Strategies and Aerosol Persistence in Dental Environments 91%
- Routine saliva testing for the identification of silent COVID-19 infections in healthcare workers 88%
- N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators Remain Effective After Extensive Reuse During the COVID-19 Pandemic 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health-seeking behaviour and beliefs around sore throat in The Gambia: a qualitative study 91%
- Silicone toothbrushes: A scoping review of an underutilized tool in global oral health 90%
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.