Back

Surveillance of COVID-19 cases associated with dental settings using routine health data from the East of Scotland with a description of efforts to break chains of transmission from October 2020 to December 2021.

Mc Goldrick, N.; O'Keefe, E.

2022-03-13 dentistry and oral medicine
10.1101/2022.03.11.22272263 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionDental settings have been considered high risk setting s for COVID-19. A Dental Public Health Team in South East Scotland have worked to risk assess the situation timeously to break chains of transmission. AimTo present routine data produced from a contact tracing service for COVID-19 cases in the dental setting with a focus on transmission. DesignObservational retrospective analysis of a routine data set of COVID-19 cases associated with a dental setting reported via the national contact tracing system for two health board areas in the east of Scotland. MethodsCOVID-19 cases were confirmed by PCR testing. Descriptive statistics are used to summarise the data collected over a 13-month period (Oct 2020-Dec 2021). A narrative presents themes identified during contact tracing that led to transmission within a dental setting and includes a case study. ResultsA total of 811 incidents are included. No evidence of staff to patient transmission or vice versa was found in this study. Staff to staff transmission occurred in non-clinical areas contributing to 33% of total staff cases. ConclusionTransmission of COVID-19 in a dental setting in the context of this study appears to be confined to non-clinical areas. Future pandemic plans should include tools to aid with implementation of guidance in non-clinical areas. In brief pointsO_LIOutbreaks of COVID-19 in a dental setting appear to be confined to the non-clinical areas of dental practices. C_LIO_LIWe have found no evidence of staff to patient transmission or vice versa using our contact tracing methods. C_LIO_LIFuture pandemic preparedness would benefit from including current quality improvement tools to aid with implementation of new standard operating procedures and other regularly changing guidance. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Dental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.3%
3
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
4
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
7
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.5%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
13
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
15
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
16
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
19
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
22
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
23
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%