Back

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation modulates corticospinal excitability while preserving motor unit discharge properties during isometric contractions

Hernandez-Pavon, J. C.; Avrillon, S.; Hoo, G.; Pons, J. L.

2022-03-12 physiology
10.1101/2022.03.10.483702 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) aims to supplement sensory feedback to improve force steadiness or motor function. In this study, we directly assessed potential changes in corticospinal excitability and motor unit discharge characteristics from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle due to TENS by using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and high-density surface electromyography (HDsEMG). MethodsEleven healthy young adults performed a series of submaximal isometric index abductions. We estimated i) motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes, ii) persistent inward current amplitudes (PIC, i.e., delta F), iii) motor unit recruitment thresholds and discharge rates, and iv) common synaptic input to motor units before and after TENS. ResultsTENS did not affect force steadiness (2.5 {+/-} 0.9% and 3.3 {+/-} 1.9% (p = 0.010)). MEP amplitudes decreased at 110% of the resting motor threshold (rMT; 0.72 {+/-} 0.66 mV vs. 0.59 {+/-} 0.63 mV; p < 0.001), increased at 130% rMT (1.18 {+/-} 1.10 mV vs. 1.41 {+/-} 1.29 mV; p < 0.001). Delta F increased after TENS (3.7 {+/-} 2.2 pps vs. 4.5 {+/-} 2.6 pps; p = 0.010). We did not find a change in the level of common synaptic input or in the temporal variability of motor unit discharge rates after the session of TENS. ConclusionThese results suggest that TENS can modulate corticospinal excitability through supraspinal and spinal processes and, thus act as a priming technique. At the same time, TENS does not generate short-term changes in the neural control of force in young, healthy adults.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.