Stack Mapping Anchor Points (SMAP): a versatile suite of tools for read-backed haplotyping
Schaumont, D.; Veeckman, E.; Van der Jeugt, F.; Haegeman, A.; van Glabeke, S.; Bawin, Y.; Lukasiewicz, J.; Blugeon, S.; Barre, P.; Leyva-Perez, M. d. l. O.; Byrne, S. L.; Dawyndt, P.; Ruttink, T.
Show abstract
Here we present SMAP, a software package that implements a suite of computational tools to extract multi-allelic haplotypes using read-backed haplotyping. SMAP tools first perform accurate read processing and analyze read mapping distributions across sample sets. Then, two complementary modules can be invoked for haplotype calling: SMAP haplotype-sites combines known Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and/or read mapping position polymorphisms (SMAPs) to reconstruct compressed, read-reference-encoded haplotype strings. In contrast, SMAP haplotype-window works independent of prior knowledge of polymorphisms, groups reads by locus, defines a window enclosed between two custom border sequences, and retains the entire corresponding DNA sequence as haplotype. Haplotype-window is, among many applications, especially useful for high-throughput CRISPR/Cas mutation screens. Either way, SMAP creates a single integrated haplotype call table across all loci and samples. SMAP haplotyping is extremely versatile and can be applied to highly multiplex amplicon sequencing (HiPlex), Shotgun (e.g. whole genome shotgun (WGS) sequencing, probe capture and RNA-Seq), or Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) data; and to Illumina short reads, PacBio and MinION long reads. SMAP creates discrete genotype calls for individuals of any ploidy or quantitative haplotype frequency spectra for Pool-Seq data, and can scale from tens to thousands of loci and/or samples. SMAP, including the source code written in Python is available at https://gitlab.com/truttink/smap, and a detailed user manual and guidelines for accurate read processing is available at https://ngs-smap.readthedocs.io/, under the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Low-pass sequencing plus imputation using avidity sequencing displays comparable imputation accuracy to sequencing by synthesis while reducing duplicates 95%
- Minimizing detection bias of somatic mutations in a highly heterozygous oak genome 95%
- Concerning the eXclusion in human genomics: The choice of sex chromosome representation in the human genome drastically affects number of identified variants 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Potato dihaploids uncover diverse alleles to facilitate diploid potato breeding 93%
- Chromosome-level haplotype-resolved genome assembly provides insights into the highly heterozygous genome of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) 93%
- A second generation capture panel for cost-effective sequencing of genome regulatory regions in wheat and relatives 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.