Back

DNA Double Strand Breaks cause chromosome loss through sister chromatid tethering in human embryos

Turocy, J.; Marin, D.; Xu, S.; Xu, J.; Robles, A.; Treff, N.; Egli, D.

2022-03-10 developmental biology
10.1101/2022.03.10.483502 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Summary paragraphGenome editing by DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) is currently being investigated as a tool to treat or even prevent heritable diseases1. However, DNA repair mechanisms in the human embryo remain poorly understood and DSBs may result in chromosome loss 2,3. Here we provide evidence of whole and segmental chromosome loss in over one third of chromosomes 16, 17 and X targeted by CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA DSB, including pericentromeric and mid-arm sites. Chromosomal changes were asymmetric relative to the Cas9 cut site: segmental losses occurred on both centric as well as acentric chromosome arms, while gains were exclusively found on acentric arms, suggesting that centromeres in broken chromosomes continued to mediate sister chromatid separation. Using this pattern of chromosomal errors, we were able to define new genomic coordinates of the active centromere on chromosome 16. Asymmetry was also found in the attrition of gDNA at the break site: attrition occurred centromeric of the DSB, while telomeric to the break, chromosomal ends were protected. Thus, spindle forces at centromeres and end tethering and protection at DSBs are antagonistic forces that interfere with accurate segregation of sister chromatids. Thereby, a single DSB is sufficient to result in the loss of a chromosome from the embryo. These results highlight the risks of aneuploidy in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, while also providing a mechanism for mitotically acquired aneuploidy caused by DNA breaks in human embryos.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.