Epithelial monolayer development and tight junction assembly on nanopillar arrays
Yeste, J.; Illa, X.; Shashikanth, N.; Guimera Brunet, A.; Villa, R.; Turner, J. R.
Show abstract
Nanostructured materials provide an outstanding opportunity to both stimulate and measure cellular processes. In the context of tight junctions, it was previously reported that transient application of a nanotopographic surface over the apical brush border membrane of epithelial monolayers triggers redistribution of ZO-1, claudins, and F-actin that increases paracellular macromolecular flux. In excitable tissues, nanomaterials have been used to apply and measure electrical signals, such action potentials. As a first step towards translating these technologies for use in analysis of epithelial function, we sought to culture monolayers composed of transporting epithelia over nanopillar arrays without perturbing cellular structure or function. Madin-Darby Canine kidney I (MDCK I) cells were cultured on collagen-coated silicon chips with [~]1 m diameter nanopillar arrays. Fluorescence and scanning electron microscopy were used to assess the impact of height on nanopillar-epithelial interactions. Monolayers formed over and were largely unaffected by short nanopillars. These nanopillars were located beneath basal epithelial surfaces and were not preferentially located within lateral intercellular spaces or beneath ZO-1-containing junctions. In contrast, tall nanopillars that exceeded cell height disrupted MDCK I monolayer growth. Cells interacted with, encircled, and extended cytoplasm over the top of tall nanopillars, and dense ZO-1 and F-actin accumulations occasionally surrounded apical membranes adjacent to nanopillars. Finally, when grown over arrays composed of nanopillars 1 - 2 m shorter than cells, MDCK I frequently grew between nanopillars. As a result, nanopillars were more commonly present within lateral intercellular spaces beneath junctions. Apical complex structure was intact, as assessed by fluorescence microscopy of ZO-1, occludin, claudin-2, F-actin, and E-cadherin. Apical microvilli were also unaffected. We therefore show that conditions can be defined to allow growth of mature, correctly assembled epithelial monolayers with nanopillars localized to lateral intercellular spaces. This sets the stage for application of nanotechnologies for perturbation and analysis of epithelial biology.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A workflow integrating organ-on-chip culture and correlative 3D light and electron microscopy for microtissue analysis 92%
- Unique Cancer Motility Behaviors in Confined Spaces of Microgroove Topography with Acute Wall Angles 91%
- Modular automated microfluidic cell culture platform reduces glycolytic stress in cerebral cortex organoids 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating sources of technical variability in the mechano-node-pore sensing pipeline and their effect on the reproducibility of single-cell mechanical phenotyping 92%
- Quasi-periodic migration of single cells on short microlanes 92%
- Cost-efficient boundary-free surface patterning achieves high effective-throughput of time-lapse microscopy experiments 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- CellStudio: a Modular, Tunable and Accessible Platform for Analysis of Growth Factors Secretions in Cell Cultures 92%
- A Programmable Toolkit to Dynamically Signal Cells using Peptide Strand Displacement 90%
- Superhydrophobic Rotation-Chip for Computer-Vision Identification of Drug-Resistant Bacteria 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatiotemporal analysis of F-actin polymerization with micropillar arrays reveals synchronization between adhesion sites 91%
- Matrix obstructions cause multiscale disruption in collective epithelial migration by suppressing physical function of leader cells 90%
- Differential modulation of cellular phenotype and drug sensitivity by extracellular matrix proteins in primary and metastatic pancreatic cancer cells 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.