Back

Associations between maternal infections during pregnancy and childhood IQ scores using the ALSPAC birth cohort

Kwok, J.; Hall, H. A.; Murray, A. L.; Lombardo, M. V.; Auyeung, B.

2022-03-12 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.03.09.22272147 medRxiv
Show abstract

Maternal prenatal infections have been linked to childrens neurodevelopment and cognitive outcomes. It remains unclear, however, whether infections occurring during specific vulnerable gestational periods can affect childrens cognitive outcomes. The study aimed to examine maternal infections in each trimester of pregnancy and associations with childrens verbal, performance, and total IQ scores. The ALSPAC birth cohort was used to investigate associations between maternal infections in pregnancy and childhood IQ outcomes. Infection data from mothers and cognition data from children were included with the final study sample size comprising 7,410 mother-child participants. Regression analysis was used to examine links between maternal infections occurring at each trimester of pregnancy and childrens cognitive IQ scores at 18 months, 4 years, and 8 years. Infections in the third trimester were significantly associated with decreased verbal IQ at age 4 (p<.05, adjusted R2 = .004); decreased verbal IQ (p<.01, adjusted R2 = .001), performance IQ (p<.01, adjusted R2 = .0008), and total IQ at age 8 (p<.01, adjusted R2 = .001). Results suggest that later maternal infections could have a latent effect on cognitive development, only emerging when cognitive load increases over time, though magnitude of effect appears to be small. Performance IQ may be more vulnerable to trimester-specific exposure to maternal infection as compared to verbal IQ. Future research could include examining potential mediating mechanisms on childhood cognition, such as possible moderating effects of early childhood environmental factors, and if effects persist in future cognitive outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.