Back

Self-injury, suicidal ideation and -attempt and eating disorders in young people following the initial and second COVID-19 lockdown

Danielsen, S.; Joensen, A.; Andersen, P. K.; Madsen, T.; Strandberg-Larsen, K.

2022-03-10 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.03.08.22271980 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe initial COVID-19 lockdowns have had negative effect on different mental health measures, especially in young women. However, the impact on self-injury, suicidality and eating disorder (ED) are less elucidated and remains inconsistent. We compare self-reported self-injury, suicide ideation and -attempt and symptoms of EDs from before through different pandemic periods until spring 2021. MethodsYoung participants in the Danish National Birth Cohort reported these measures in an 18-year follow-up in 2015-2021 and in a COVID-19 survey in spring 2021 when participants were aged 19-24 years. Changes in measures from pre to post lockdown were estimated with longitudinal data (N=7,597) and with repeated cross-sectional data (N=24,625) by linear regression. FindingsIn the longitudinal comparisons 14% of women and 7% of men reported self-injury pre lockdown, which decreased 6%-points (95% CI:-7%;-5%) for women and 3%-points (95% CI:-4%;-2%) for men during lockdown. For suicide ideation, the pre lockdown proportions were 25% and 18% for women and men respectively, and decreased 7%-points (95% CI:-8%;-6%) for women and 3%-points (95% CI:-5%;-1%) for men. For suicide attempt no change was observed. Pre lockdown 15% and 3% of women and men, respectively, had symptoms of EDs, which decreased 2%-points (95% CI:-3%;-1%) for women. We observed no changes in proportions of self-injury, suicide ideation or EDs in the repeated cross-sectional data. InterpretationOur findings provide no support for increase in self-injury, suicidality and EDs following the lockdowns, and if anything, indicate a reduction in self-injury and suicide ideation as well as EDs in women.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.