Back

Characterization of Hydrophobic Interactions of SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV Spike Protein Fusion Peptides Using Single Molecule Force Measurements

Qiu, C.; Whittaker, G.; Gellman, S. H.; Daniel, S.; Abbott, N. L.

2022-03-07 biophysics
10.1101/2022.03.05.483104 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We address the challenge of understanding how hydrophobic interactions are encoded by fusion peptide sequences within coronavirus (CoV) spike proteins. Within the fusion peptides of SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, a largely conserved peptide sequence called FP1 (SFIEDLLFNK and SAIEDLLFDK in SARS-2 and MERS, respectively) has been proposed to play a key role in encoding hydrophobic interactions that drive viral-host cell membrane fusion. While a non-polar triad (LLF) is common to both FP1 sequences, and thought to dominate the encoding of hydrophobic interactions, FP1 from SARS and MERS differ in two residues (Phe 2 versus Ala 2 and Asn 9 versus Asp 9, respectively). Here we explore if single molecule force measurements can quantify hydrophobic interactions encoded by FP1 sequences, and then ask if sequence variations between FP1 from SARS and MERS lead to significant differences in hydrophobic interactions. We find that both SARS-2 and MERS wild-type FP1 generate measurable hydrophobic interactions at the single molecule level, but that SARS-2 FP1 encodes a substantially stronger hydrophobic interaction than its MERS counterpart (1.91 {+/-} 0.03 nN versus 0.68 {+/-} 0.03 nN, respectively). By performing force measurements with FP1 sequences with single amino acid substitutions, we determine that a single residue mutation (Phe 2 versus Ala 2) causes the almost threefold difference in the hydrophobic interaction strength generated by the FP1 of SARS-2 versus MERS, despite the presence of LLF in both sequences. Infrared spectroscopy and circular dichroism measurements support the proposal that the outsized influence of Phe 2 versus Ala 2 on the hydrophobic interaction arises from variation in the secondary structure adopted by FP1. Overall, these insights reveal how single residue diversity in viral fusion peptides, including FP1 of SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, can lead to substantial changes in intermolecular interactions proposed to play a key role in viral fusion, and hint at strategies for regulating hydrophobic interactions of peptides in a range of contexts. SIGNIFICANCEFusion of coronaviruses (CoVs) and host cells is mediated by the insertion of the fusion peptide (FP) of the viral spike protein into the host cell membrane. Hydrophobic interactions between FPs with their host cell membranes regulate the viral membrane fusion process and are key to determining infection ability. However, it is not fully understood how the amino acid sequences in FPs mediate hydrophobic interactions. We use single-molecule force measurements to characterize hydrophobic interactions of FPs from SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV. Our findings provide insight into the mechanisms by which the amino acid composition of FPs encodes hydrophobic interactions and their implications for fusion activity critical to the spread of infection.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.4%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 1%
19.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 10%
7.2%
4
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
5
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
7
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.4%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
9
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
11
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
12
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
13
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
14
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
15
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
16
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
18
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
27
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%