Back

Meta analysis and experimental re-evaluation of the Boyle van 't Hoff relation with osmoregulation modelled by linear elastic principles and ion osmolyte leakage

Olver, D. J.; Azam, I.; Benson, J. D.

2022-03-07 biophysics
10.1101/2022.03.05.483010 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In this study we challenge the paradigm of using the Boyle van t Hoff (BvH) relation to relate cell size as a linear function of inverse extracellular osmotic pressure for short time periods (~5 to 30 mins). We present alternative models that account for mechanical resistance (turgor model) and ion-osmolyte leakage (leak model), which is not accounted for by the BvH relation. To test the BvH relation and the alternative models, we conducted a meta-analysis of published BvH datasets, as well as new experiments using a HepG2 cell line. Our meta-analysis showed that the BvH relation may be assumed of the hypertonic region but cannot be assumed a priori over the hyper- and hypotonic region. Both alternative models perform better than the BvH relation but are nearly indistinguishable when plotted. The return to isotonic conditions plot indicated neither alternative model accurate predicts return volumes for HepG2 cells. However, a combined turgor-leak model accurately predicts both the BvH plot and the return to isotonic conditions plot. Moreover, this turgor-leak model provides a facile method to estimate the membrane-cortex Youngs modulus and the cell membrane permeability to intracellular ions/osmolytes during periods of osmotic challenge, and predicts a novel passive method of volume regulation without the need for ion pumps.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.3%
2
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.8%
3
European Biophysics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.8%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 26%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
11
The European Physical Journal E
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
20
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
30
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%