Evaluation of the role of home rapid antigen testing to determine isolation period after infection with SARS-CoV-2
Cosimi, L.; Kelly, C.; Esposito, S.; Seitz, S.; Sher-Jan, C.; Turcinovic, J.; Friedman, K.; Nashed, M.; Souweine, J.; Fitzgerald, N.; Gabriel, S.; Connor, J.; Hung, D.
Show abstract
ImportanceRecent CDC COVID-19 isolation guidance for non-immunocompromised individuals with asymptomatic or mild infection allows ending isolation after 5 days if asymptomatic or afebrile with improving symptoms. The role of rapid antigen testing in further characterizing the risk of viral transmission to others is unclear. ObjectiveUnderstand rates of rapid antigen test (RAT) positivity after day 5 from a positive COVID-19 test and the relationship of this result to symptoms and viral culture. DesignIn this single center, observational cohort study, ambulatory individuals newly testing SARS-CoV-2 positive completed daily symptom logs, and RAT self-testing starting day 6 until negative. Anterior nasal and oral swabs were collected on a subset for viral culture. Main Outcomes and MeasuresDay 6 SARS-CoV-2 RAT result, symptoms and viral culture. Results40 individuals enrolled between January 5 and February 11, 2022 with a mean age of 32 years (range 22 to 57). 23 (58%) were women and 17 (42%) men. All were vaccinated. 33 (83%) were symptomatic. Ten (25%) tested RAT negative on day 6. 61 of 90 (68%) RATs performed on asymptomatic individuals after day 5 were positive. Day 6 viral cultures were positive in 6 (35%) of 17 individuals. A negative RAT or being asymptomatic on day 6 were 100% and 78% predictive respectively for negative culture, while improving symptoms was 69% predictive. A positive RAT was 50% predictive of positive culture. Conclusion and RelevanceRATs are suboptimal in predicting viral culture results on day 6. Use of routine RATs to guide end of COVID-19 isolation could result in significant numbers of culture negative, potentially non-infectious individuals undergoing prolonged isolation. However, a negative RAT was highly predictive of being culture negative. Complete absence of symptoms was inferior to a negative RAT in predicting a negative culture result, but performed better than improving symptoms. If a positive viral culture is a proxy for infectiousness, these data may help further refine a safer strategy for ending isolation.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Viral dynamics of Omicron and Delta SARS-CoV-2 variants with implications for timing of release from isolation: a longitudinal cohort study 98%
- Infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant is Associated with Higher Infectious Virus Loads Compared to the Alpha Variant in both Unvaccinated and Vaccinated Individuals 95%
- Associations between SARS-CoV-2 variants and risk of COVID-19 hospitalization among confirmed cases in Washington State: a retrospective cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nucleocapsid antigenemia is a marker of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection 95%
- SARS-CoV-2 virus dynamics in recently infected people – data from a household transmission study 94%
- Anti-membrane and anti-spike antibodies are long-lasting and together discriminate between past COVID-19 infection and vaccination 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal analysis of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine breakthrough infections reveal limited infectious virus shedding and restricted tissue distribution 96%
- A multidimensional cross-sectional analysis of COVID-19 seroprevalence among a police officer cohort: The PoliCOV-19 study 93%
- Vaccine-induced antibody level predicts the clinical course of breakthrough infection of COVID-19 caused by delta and omicron variants: a prospective observational cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trajectory of viral load in a prospective population-based cohort with incident SARS-CoV-2 G614 infection 95%
- Rapid CRISPR-based surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic college students captures the leading edge of a community-wide outbreak 94%
- Accuracy of Rapid Antigen Testing across SARS-CoV-2 Variants 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The REinfection in COVID-19 Estimation of Risk (RECOVER) study: Reinfection and serology dynamics in a cohort of Canadian healthcare workers 95%
- Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against Outpatient Illness during Widespread Circulation of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant, US Flu VE Network 94%
- Assessment of COVID-19 hospitalization risk during SARS-CoV-2 Omicron relative to Delta variant predominance, New York City, August 2021–January 2022 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.