Back

Automated Analysis of Neuronal Morphology through an Unsupervised Classification Model of Neurites

Zehtabian, A.; Fuchs, J.; Eickholt, B.; Ewers, H.

2022-03-01 bioinformatics
10.1101/2022.03.01.482454 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Brain function emerges from a highly complex network of specialized cells that are interlinked by billions of synapses. The synaptic connectivity between neurons is established between the elongated processes of their axons and dendrites or, together, neurites. To establish these billions of often far-reaching connections, cellular neurites have to grow in highly specialized, cell-type dependent patterns covering often mm distances and connecting with thousands of other neurons. The outgrowth and branching of neurites are tightly controlled during development and are a commonly used functional readout of imaging in the neurosciences. Manual analysis of neuronal morphology from microscopy images, however, is very time intensive and error prone. Especially fully automated segmentation and classification of all neurites remain unavailable in open-source software. Here we present a standalone, GUI-based software for batch-quantification of neuronal morphology in fluorescence micrographs with minimal requirements for user interaction. Neurons are segmented using a Hessian-based algorithm to detect thin neurite structures combined with intensity- and shape-based detection of the cell body. To measure the number of branches in a neuron accurately, rather than just determining branch points, neurites are classified into axon, dendrites and their branches of increasing order by their length using a geodesic distance transform of the cell skeleton. The software was benchmarked against a large, published dataset and reproduced the phenotype observed after manual annotation before. Our tool promises greatly accelerated and improved morphometric studies of neuronal morphology by allowing for consistent and automated analysis of large datasets.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.1%
3
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.4%
5
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
6
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
10
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
12
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
16
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
19
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
21
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.7%
24
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
30
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%