Back

Fly-casting with ligand-sliding and orientational selection to support the complex formation of a GPCR and a middle-sized flexible molecule

Higo, J.; Kasahara, K.; Bekker, G.-J.; Ma, B.; Sakuraba, S.; Iida, S.; Kamiya, N.; Fukuda, I.; Kono, H.; Fukunishi, Y.; Nakamura, H.

2022-03-02 biophysics
10.1101/2022.02.28.482421 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To elucidate computationally a binding mechanism of a middle-sized flexible molecule, bosentan, to a GPCR protein, human endothelin receptor type B (hETB), a GA-guided multidimensional virtual-system coupled molecular dynamics (GA-mD-VcMD) simulation was performed. This method is one of generalized ensemble methods and produces a free-energy landscape of the ligand-receptor binding by searching large-scale motions accompanied with stably keeping the fragile cell-membrane structure. All molecular components (bosentan, hETB, membrane, and solvent) were represented with an all-atom model, and sampling was carried out from conformations where bosentan was distant from the binding site in the hETBs binding pocket. The deepest basin in the resultant free-energy landscape was assigned to the native-like complex conformation. The obtained binding mechanism is as follows. First, bosentan fluctuating randomly in solution is captured by a tip region of the flexible N-terminal tail of hETB via nonspecific attractive interactions (fly-casting). Bosentan then occasionally slides from the tip to root of the N-terminal tail (ligand-sliding). In this sliding, bosentan passes the gate of the binding pocket from outside to inside of the pocket with accompanying a quick reduction of the molecular orientational variety of bosentan (orientational selection). Last, in the pocket, ligand-receptor attractive native contacts are formed, and eventually the native-like complex is completed. The bosentan-captured conformations by the tip- and root-regions of the N-terminal tail correspond to two basins in the free-energy landscape, and the ligand-sliding corresponds to overcoming a free-energy barrier between the basins.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.8%
2
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.9%
4
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
7
Biophysics and Physicobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
9
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
11
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
12
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
14
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
15
Chemistry – A European Journal
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
17
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
19
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
20
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
21
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
22
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
Quantitative Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
25
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
26
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
28
Biophysical Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
29
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%