Mutation patterns in SARS-COV-2 Alpha and Beta variants indicate non-neutral evolution
Kurpas, M. K.; Kimmel, M.
Show abstract
Due to the emergence of new variants of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, the question of how the viral genomes evolved, leading to the formation of highly infectious strains, becomes particularly important. Two early emergent strains, Alpha and Beta, characterized by a significant number of missense mutations, provide natural testing samples. In this study we are exploring the history of each of the segregating sites present in Alpha and Beta variants of concern, to address the question whether defining mutations were accumulating gradually leading to the formation of sequence characteristic of these variants. Our analysis exposes data features that suggest other than neutral evolution of SARS-CoV-2 genomes, leading to emergence of variants of concern. We observe only small number of possible combinations of mutations indicating rapid evolution of genomes. In addtion, mutation patterns observed in whole genome samples of Alpha and Beta variants also indicate presence of stronger selection than in remaining genome samples.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Earth Mover’s Distance for Viral Outbreak Investigations 93%
- Pango lineage designation and assignment using SARS-CoV-2 spike gene nucleotide sequences 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in Italy through phylogenomic inferences based on Hamming distances derived from functional annotations of SNPs, MNPs and InDels 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hacking the diversity of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-like coronaviruses in human, bat and pangolin populations 95%
- The Algerian chapter of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: An evolutionary, genetic, and epidemiological prospect of the first wave 94%
- Intrahost SARS-CoV-2 k-mer identification method (iSKIM) for rapid detection of mutations of concern reveals emergence of global mutation patterns 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.