Back

What are the reference strains of Acinetobacter baumannii referring to?

Philippe, C.; Valcek, A.; Whiteway, C.; Robino, E.; Nesporova, K.; Bove, M.; Coenye, T.; De Pooter, T.; De Coster, W.; Strazisar, M.; Kenyon, J. J.; Van der Henst, C.

2022-02-27 microbiology
10.1101/2022.02.27.482139 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We assembled the whole genome sequence (WGS) of a collection of 43 non-redundant modern clinical isolates and four broadly used reference strains of Acinetobacter baumannii. Comparison of these isolates and their WGS confirmed the high heterogeneity in capsule loci, sequence types, the presence of virulence and antibiotic resistance genes. However, a significant portion of clinical isolates strongly differ when compared to several reference strains in the light of colony morphology, cellular density, capsule production, natural transformability and in vivo virulence. These genetic and phenotypic differences between current circulating strains of A. baumannii and established reference strains could hamper the study of A. baumannii as an entity. The broadly used reference strains led to the current state of the art of the A. baumannii field, however, we propose that established reference strains in the A. baumannii field should be carefully used, because of the high genetic and phenotypic heterogeneities. In this study, we generated a collection of high-quality nucleotide sequences of 43 modern clinical isolates with the corresponding multi-level phenotypic characterizations. Beside the contribution of novel fundamental observations generated in this study, the phenotypic and genetic data, along with the bacterial strains themselves, will be further accessible using the first open access online platform called "Acinetobase". Therefore, a rational choice of modern strains will be possible to select the ones that suit the needs of specific biological questions.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.