Back

A pleiotropic flowering time QTL exhibits gene-by-environmental interaction for fitness in a perennial grass

Weng, X.; Haque, T.; Zhang, L.; Razzaque, S.; Lovell, J. T.; Palacio-Mejia, J. D.; Duberney, P.; Reilley, J. L.; Bonnette, J.; Juenger, T. E.

2022-03-01 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2022.02.26.482116 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Flowering time is crucial for wild plant populations to adapt to their local environments. Although the genetic basis of flowering variation has been studied in many plant species, its mechanisms in non-model organisms and its adaptive value in the field are still poorly understood. Here, we report new insights into the genetic basis of flowering time and its effect on fitness in Panicum hallii, a native perennial grass. We conducted genetic mapping in populations derived from representative inland and coastal ecotypes to identify flowering time QTL and loci exhibited extensive QTL-by-environment interactions. Patterns of segregation within recombinant hybrids provide strong support for directional selection driving ecotypic divergence in flowering time. A major QTL on chromosome 5 (q-FT5) was detected in all experiments and is a key locus controlling flowering variation. Fine-mapping and expression studies identified a FLOWERING LOCUS T orthologue, FT-like 9 (PhFTL9), as the candidate underlying q-FT5. We used reciprocal transplant experiment to test for global local adaptation and the specific impact of q-FT5 on performance. We did not observe local adaptation in terms of fitness tradeoffs when contrasting ecotypes in home versus away habitats. However, we observed that the coastal allele of q-FT5 conferred a fitness advantage only in its local habitat but not at the inland site. Sequence analysis of the PhFTL9 promoter identified ecotypic specific cis-element variation associated with environmental responsiveness. Together, our findings demonstrate the genetic basis of flowering variation in a perennial grass and provide evidence for conditional neutrality underlying flowering divergence.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.