The impact of COVID passport mandates on the number of cases of and hospitalizations with COVID-19 in the UK: a difference-in-differences analysis
Lopez-Güell, K.; Prats-Uribe, A.; Catala, M.; Prats, C.; Hein, J.; PRIETO-ALHAMBRA, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundMandatory COVID-19 certification was introduced at different times in the four countries of the UK. We aimed to study the effect of this intervention on the incidence of cases and hospital admissions. MethodsThe main outcome was the weekly averaged incidence of COVID-19 confirmed cases and hospital admissions. We performed Negative Binomial Segmented Regression (NBSR) and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) analyses for the four countries (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales), and fitted Difference-in-Differences (DiD) models to compare the latter three to England, where COVID-19 certification was imposed the latest. FindingsNBSR methods suggested COVID-19 certification led to a decrease in the incidence of cases in Northern Ireland, but not in hospitalizations. In Wales, they also caused a decrease in the incidence of cases but not in hospital admissions. In Scotland, we observed a decrease in both cases and admissions. ARIMA models confirmed these results. The DiD model showed that the intervention decreased the incidence of COVID compared to England in all countries except Wales, in October. Then, the incidence rate of cases already had a decreasing tendency, as well as in England, hence a particular impact of Covid Passport was less obvious. In Wales, the model coefficients were 2.2 (95% CI -6.24,10.70) for cases and -0.144 (95% CI -0.248, -0.039) for admissions in October and -7.75 (95% CI -13.1, -2.46) for cases and -0.169 (95% CI-0.308, -0.031) for admissions in November. In Northern Ireland, -10.1 (95% CI -18.4, -1.79) for cases and -0.269 (95% CI -0.385, -0.153) for admissions. In Scotland they were 7.91 (95% CI 4.46,11.4) for cases and -0.097 (95% CI - 0.219,0.024) for admissions. InterpretationThe introduction of mandatory certificates decreased cases in all countries except in England. Differences on concomitant measures, on vaccination uptake or Omicron variant prevalence could explain this discrepancy.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Migrants’ primary care utilisation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: An interrupted time series 92%
- Predictors of uncertainty and unwillingness to receive the COVID-19 booster vaccine: an observational study of 22,139 fully vaccinated adults in the UK 92%
- Time varying association between deprivation, ethnicity and SARS-CoV-2 infections in England: a space-time study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in England during April to September 2020: Results from the ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey 94%
- Detecting COVID-19 infection hotspots in England using large-scale self-reported data from a mobile application: a prospective, observational study 94%
- The effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccinating school children required to contain SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant outbreaks in Australia: a modelling analysis 93%
- SARS-CoV-2 infection risk during delivery of childhood vaccination campaigns: a modelling study 92%
- Health impacts of takeaway management zones around schools in six different local authorities across England: a public health modelling study using PRIMEtime 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Deep Recurrent Reinforced Learning model to compare the efficacy of targeted local vs. national measures on the spread of COVID-19 in the UK 94%
- Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment 94%
- Modelling the impact of lockdown easing measures on cumulative COVID-19 cases and deaths in England 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Paediatric infection hospital admissions in England before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Contact patterns before and during the UK’s Autumn 2020 COVID-19 lockdown among university students and staff 92%
- Protective effect of a first SARS-CoV-2 infection from reinfection: a matched retrospective cohort study using PCR testing data in England 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.