Back

Epidermal basal domains organization highlights skin robustness to environmental exposure

Ghuwalewala, S.; Lee, S. A.; Jiang, K.; Baidya, J.; Chovatiya, G.; Kaur, P.; Shalloway, D.; Tumbar, T.

2022-02-24 developmental biology
10.1101/2022.02.23.481662 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Adult interfollicular epidermis (IFE) renewal is likely orchestrated by physiological demands of its complex tissue architecture comprising spatial and cellular heterogeneity. Mouse tail and back skin display two kinds of basal IFE spatial domains that regenerate at different rates. Here we elucidate the molecular and cellular states of basal IFE domains by marker expression and single cell transcriptomics in mouse and human skin. We uncover two paths of basal cell differentiation that reflect in part the IFE spatial domain organization. We unravel previously unrecognized similarities between mouse tail IFE basal domains defined as scales and interscales versus human rete ridges and inter-ridges, respectively. Second, our basal IFE transcriptomics and gene targeting in mice provide evidence supporting a physiological role of IFE domains: adaptation to differential UV exposure. We identify Sox6 as a novel UV-induced and interscale/inter-ridge basal IFE-domain transcription factor, important for IFE proliferation and survival. The spatial, cellular, and molecular organization of IFE basal domains underscores skin adaptation to environmental exposure and its unusual robustness in adult homeostasis. Synopsis O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=112 SRC="FIGDIR/small/481662v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (42K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1565ee8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@170f3e1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9b67adorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b3ba40_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.