Back

Age influences audiovisual speech processing in multi-talker scenarios - Evidence from cortical oscillations

Begau, A.; Klatt, L.-I.; Schneider, D.; Wascher, E.; Getzmann, S.

2022-02-25 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.02.23.481314 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Age-related differences in the processing of audiovisual speech in a multi-talker environment were investigated analyzing event-related spectral perturbations (ERSPs), focusing on theta, alpha, and beta oscillations that are assumed to reflect conflict processing, multisensory integration, and attentional mechanisms, respectively. Eighteen older and 21 younger healthy adults completed a two-alternative forced-choice word discrimination task, responding to audiovisual speech stimuli. In a cocktail-party scenario with two competing talkers (located at-15{degrees} and 15{degrees} azimuth), target words (/yes/ or /no/) appeared at a pre-defined (attended) position, distractor words at the other position. In two audiovisual conditions, acoustic speech was combined either with congruent or uninformative visual speech. While a behavioral benefit for congruent audiovisual speech occurred for both age groups, differences between audiovisual conditions in the theta and beta band were only present for older adults. A stronger increase in theta perturbations for stimuli containing uninformative visual speech could be associated with early conflict processing, while a stronger suppression in beta perturbations for congruent audiovisual speech could be associated to audiovisual integration. Compared to the younger group, the older group showed generally stronger beta perturbations. No condition differences in the alpha band were found. Overall, the findings suggest age-related differences in audiovisual speech integration in a multi-talker environment. While the behavioral benefit of congruent audiovisual speech was unaffected by age, older adults had a stronger need for cognitive control when processing conflicting audiovisual speech input. Furthermore, mechanisms of audiovisual integration are differently activated depending on the informational content of the visual information.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.