Loss of E-cadherin Induces IGF1R Activation Revealing a Targetable Pathway in Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma
Elangovan, A.; Hooda, J.; Savariau, L.; Puthanmadhomnarayanan, S.; Yates, M. E.; Chen, J.; Brown, D. D.; McAuliffe, P. F.; Oesterreich, S.; Atkinson, J. M.; Lee, A. V.
Show abstract
No Special Type breast cancer (NST; commonly known as Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC)) and Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC) are the two major histological subtypes of breast cancer with significant differences in clinicopathological and molecular characteristics. The defining pathognomonic feature of ILC is loss of cellular adhesion protein, E-cadherin (CDH1). We have previously shown that E-cadherin functions as a negative regulator of the Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Receptor (IGF1R) and propose that E-cadherin loss in ILC sensitizes cells to growth factor signaling which thus alters their sensitivity to growth factor signaling inhibitors and their downstream activators. To investigate this potential therapeutic vulnerability, we generated CRISPR-mediated CDH1 knockout (CDH1 KO) IDC cell lines (MCF7, T47D, ZR75.1) to uncover the mechanism by which loss of E-cadherin results in IGF pathway activation. CDH1 KO cells demonstrated enhanced invasion and migration that was further elevated in response to IGF1, serum and Collagen I. CDH1 KO cells exhibited increased sensitivity to IGF resulting in elevated downstream signaling. Despite minimal differences in membranous IGF1R levels between wildtype (WT) and CDH1 KO cells, significantly higher ligand-receptor interaction was observed in the CDH1 KO cells, potentially conferring enhanced downstream signaling activation. Critically, increased sensitivity to IGF1R, PI3K, Akt and MEK inhibitors was observed in CDH1 KO cells and ILC patient-derived organoids, suggesting that these targets require further exploration in ILC treatment and that CDH1 loss may be exploited as a biomarker of response for patient stratification.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- PRMT1 regulates EGFR and Wnt signaling pathways and is a promising target for combinatorial treatment of breast cancer 95%
- The efficacy of CB-103, a first-in-class transcriptional Notch inhibitor, in preclinical models of breast cancer 95%
- HERC1 regulates breast cancer cells migration and invasion 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- PI3K/AKT signaling allows for MAPK/ERK pathway independency mediating dedifferentiation-driven treatment resistance in melanoma 92%
- Immunomodulatory effects of tumor Lactate Dehydrogenase C (LDHC) in breast cancer 91%
- Recurring EPHB1 mutations in human cancers alter receptor signalling and compartmentalisation of colorectal cancer cells 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying and targeting key driver genes for collagen production within the 11q13/14 breast cancer amplicon 95%
- Mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1 (MDC1) is a novel estrogen receptor co-regulator in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast 94%
- Insulin Resistance Increases TNBC Aggressiveness and Brain Metastasis via Adipocyte-derived Exosomes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeting STAT3 signalling using stabilised sulforaphane (SFX-01) inhibits endocrine resistant stem-like cells in ER-positive breast cancer 95%
- Postpartum breast cancer progression is driven by semaphorin 7a mediated invasion and survival 95%
- EGFR amplification and PI3K pathway mutations identify a subset of breast cancers that synergistically respond to EGFR and PI3K inhibition 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Loss of chromosome cytoband 13q14.2 orchestrates breast cancer pathogenesis and drug response 95%
- Cooperative NF-κB and Notch1 signaling promotes macrophage-mediated MenaINV expression in breast cancer 94%
- MDM2 Inhibition in Combination with Endocrine Therapy and CDK4/6 Inhibition for the Treatment of ER-Positive Breast Cancer. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.