Scottish COVID CAncer iMmunity Prevalence (SCCAMP) - a longitudinal study of patients with cancer receiving active anti-cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic
Purshouse, K.; Thomson, J. P.; Vallet, M.; Alexander, L.; Bonisteel, I.; Brennan, M.; Cameron, D.; Figueroa, J.; Furrie, E.; Haig, P.; Heck, M.; McCaughan, H.; Mitchell, P. D.; McVicars, H.; Primrose, L.; Templeton, K.; Wilson, N.; Hall, P. S.
Show abstract
BackgroundCancer and systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) have been identified as possible risk factors for infection and related severe illness associated with SARS-CoV-2 virus as a consequence of immune suppression. The Scottish COVID CAncer iMmunity Prevalence (SCCAMP) study aims to characterise the incidence and outcomes of SARS-Cov-2 infection in patients undergoing active anti-cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and their antibody response following vaccination. Patients and MethodsEligible patients were those attending secondary care for active anti-cancer treatment for a solid tumour. Blood samples were taken for total SARS-CoV-2 antibody assay (Siemens) at baseline and after 1.5, 3, 6 and 12 months. Data on COVID-19 infection, vaccination, cancer type, treatment and outcome was obtained from routine electronic health records. ResultsThe study recruited 766 eligible participants between 28th May 2020 and 31st October 2021. The median age was 62.7 years, and 66.5% were female. Most received cytotoxic chemotherapy (79%), with the remaining 14% receiving immunotherapy and 7% receiving another form of anti-cancer therapy (radiotherapy, other systemic anti-cancer treatment). 48 (6.3%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR during the study period. The overall infection rate matched that of the age-matched local general population until May 2021, after which population levels appeared higher. Antibody testing detected additional evidence of infection prior to vaccination, taking the total number to 58 (7.6%). There was no significant difference in SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive test rates based on type of anti-cancer treatment. Mortality proportion was similar between those who died within 90 days of a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR and those with no positive PCR (10.4% vs 10.6%). Death from all causes was lowest among vaccinated patients, and of the patients who had a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR at any time, all of those who died during the study period were unvaccinated. Multivariate analysis correcting for age, gender, socioeconomic status, comorbidities and number of previous medications revealed that vaccination was associated with a significantly lower infection rate regardless of treatment with chemotherapy or immunotherapy with hazard ratios of 0.307 (95% CI 0.144-0.6548) or 0.314 (95% CI 0.041-2.367) in vaccinated patients respectively. Where antibody data was available, 96.3% of patients successfully raised SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at a time point after vaccination. This was unaffected by treatment type. ConclusionSCCAMP provides real-world evidence that patients with cancer undergoing SACT have a high antibody response and protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection following COVID-19 vaccination. Highlights- The SCCAMP dataset represents the largest longitudinal study of patients with cancer undergoing anti-cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic - Rates of infection in the cancer cohort mirrored those of the local age adjusted population - Vaccination was effective in patients with cancer undergoing active treatment in terms of antibody response and SARS-CoV-2 PCR rates - Treatment type did not impact the rate of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of PD-(L)1 blockade monotherapy compared to PD-(L)1 blockade plus chemotherapy in first-line PD-L1-positive advanced lung adenocarcinomas: A cohort study 92%
- Combination of oncolytic Maraba virus with immune checkpoint blockade overcomes therapy resistance in an immunologically cold model of advanced melanoma with dysfunctional T cell receptor signalling. 92%
- Tumor-agnostic transcriptome-based classifier identifies spatial infiltration patterns of CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment and predicts clinical outcome in early- and late-phase clinical trials 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Time to SARS-CoV-2 Clearance Among Patients with Cancer and COVID-19 93%
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 93%
- Restriction site associated DNA sequencing for tumour mutation burden estimation and mutation signature analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying therapeutic targets for cancer: 2,094 circulating proteins and risk of nine cancers 93%
- Adjuvant nivolumab, capecitabine or the combination in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer: the OXEL randomized phase II study 92%
- Angiogenic and Immune Predictors of Neoadjuvant Axitinib Response in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Venous Tumour Thrombus 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibody levels following vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: associations with post-vaccination infection and risk factors 92%
- Clinical Characteristics, Racial Inequities, and Outcomes in Patients with Breast Cancer and COVID-19: A COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) Cohort Study 92%
- Increased Burden of Familial-associated Early-onset Cancer Risk among Latino Americans Compared to non-Latino Whites 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.