Back

A connectome-based model of conscious access in monkey cortex

Klatzmann, U.; Froudist-Walsh, S.; Bliss, D. P.; Theodoni, P.; Mejias, J. F.; Niu, M.; Rapan, L.; Palomero-Gallagher, N.; Sergent, C.; Dehaene, S.; Wang, X.-J.

2022-05-05 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.02.20.481230 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A growing body of evidence suggests that conscious perception of a sensory stimulus coincides with all-or-none activity across multiple cortical areas, a phenomenon called ignition. In contrast, the same stimulus, when undetected, induces only transient activity. In this work, we report a large-scale model of the macaque cortex based on recently quantified structural mesoscopic connectome data. We use this model to simulate a detection task, and demonstrate how a dynamical bifurcation mechanism produces ignition-like events in the model network. The model predicts that feedforward excitatory transmission is primarily mediated by the fast AMPA receptors to ensure rapid signal propagation from sensory to associative areas. In contrast, a greater proportion of the inter-areal feedback projections and local recurrent excitation depend on the slow NMDA receptors, to ensure ignition of distributed frontoparietal activity. Our model predicts, counterintuitively, that fast-responding sensory areas contain a higher ratio of NMDA to AMPA receptors compared to association cortical areas that show slow, sustained activity. We validate this prediction using cortex-wide in-vitro receptor autoradiography data. Finally, we show how this model can account for various behavioral and physiological effects linked to consciousness. Together, these findings clarify the neurophysiological mechanisms of conscious access in the primate cortex and support the concept that gradients of receptor densities along the cortical hierarchy contribute to distributed cognitive functions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.