Back

D2 dopamine receptor expression, sensitivity to rewards, and reinforcement learning in a complex value-based decision-making task

Banuelos, C.; Creswell, K.; Walsh, C.; Manuck, S. B.; Gianaros, P. J.; Verstynen, T.

2022-02-19 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.02.18.481052 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In the basal ganglia, different dopamine subtypes have opposing dynamics at post-synaptic receptors, with the ratio of D1 to D2 receptors determining the relative sensitivity to gains and losses, respectively, during value-based learning. This effective sensitivity to reward feedback interacts with phasic dopamine levels to determine the effectiveness of learning, particularly in dynamic feedback situations where frequency and magnitude of rewards need to be integrated over time to make optimal decisions. Using both simulations and behavioral data in humans, we evaluated how reduced sensitivity to losses, relative to gains, leads to suboptimal learning in the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), a complex value-learning task. In the behavioral data, we tested individuals with a variant of the human dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2; -141C Ins/Del and Del/Del) gene that associates with lower levels of D2 receptor expression (N=119) and compared their performance to non-carrier controls (N=319). The magnitude of the reward response was measured by looking at ventral striatal (VS) reactivity to rewards in the Cards task using fMRI. DRD2 variant carriers had generally lower performance in the IGT than non-carriers, consistent with reduced sensitivity to losses. There was also a positive association between VS reactivity and performance in the IGT, however, we found no statistically significant difference in this effect between DRD2 carriers and non-carriers. Thus, while reduced D2 receptor expression was associated with less efficient learning in the IGT, we did not find evidence for the moderation of this effect by the magnitude of the reward response.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
15.0%
2
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.8%
5
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
6
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.8%
11
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
12
Addiction Biology
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
15
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Psychopharmacology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.9%
23
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
24
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.8%
27
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%