Bespoke data augmentation and network construction enable developmental morphological classification on limited microscopy datasets
Groves, I.; Holmshaw, J.; Furley, D.; Towers, M.; Evans, B. D.; Placzek, M.; Fletcher, A. G.
Show abstract
Recent work has indicated a need for increased temporal resolution for studies of the early chick brain. Over a 10-hour period, the developmental potential of progenitor cells in the HH10 brain changes, and concomitantly, the brain undergoes subtle changes in morphology. We asked if we could train a deep convolutional neural network to sub-stage HH10 brains from a small dataset (<200 images). By augmenting our images with a combination of biologically informed transformations and data-driven preprocessing steps, we successfully trained a classifier to sub-stage HH10 brains to 87.1% test accuracy. To determine whether our classifier could be generally applied, we re-trained it using images (<250) of randomised control and experimental chick wings, and obtained similarly high test accuracy (86.1%). Saliency analyses revealed that biologically relevant features are used for classification. Our strategy enables training of image classifiers for various applications in developmental biology with limited microscopy data. SUMMARY STATEMENTWe train a deep convolutional network that can be generally applied to accurately classify chick embryos from images. Saliency analyses show that classification is based on biologically relevant features.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatiotemporal 3D image registration for mesoscale studies of brain development. 94%
- Machine learning-based estimation of spatial gene expression pattern during ESC-derived retinal organoid development 94%
- WaveletSEG: Automatic wavelet-based 3D nuclei segmentation and analysis for multicellular embryo quantification 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.