Back

Brain signatures for neuropsychological and everyday memory achieve high replicability and explanatory power in two data cohorts

Fletcher, E.; Farias, S.; DeCarli, C.; Gavett, B.; Widaman, K.; DeLeon, F.; Mungas, D.

2022-02-19 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.02.16.480746 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe "brain signature of cognition" concept has garnered interest as a data-driven, exploratory approach to better understand key brain regions involved in specific cognitive functions, with the potential to maximally characterize brain substrates of clinical outcomes. However, to be a robust brain phenotype, the signature approach requires a statistical foundation showing that model performance replicates across a variety of cohorts. Here, we outline a procedure that provides this foundation for a signature models of two memory-related behavioral domains. MethodIn each of two independent data cohorts, we derived regional brain gray matter thickness associations for neuropsychological and everyday cognition memory, testing for replicability. In each cohort we computed regional association to outcome in 40 randomly selected "discovery subsets" of size N = 400; we generated spatial overlap frequency maps and selected high-frequency regions as "consensus" signature masks for each cohort. We tested replicability by comparing cohort-based consensus model fits in all discovery sets. We tested explanatory power in each full cohort, compare signature model fits with competing "standard" models of each outcome. ResultSpatial replications produced strongly convergent consensus signature regions derived from UCD and ADNI. Consensus model fits were highly correlated in 40 random subsets of each cohort indicating high replicability. In comparisons over each full cohort, signature models outperformed other models with one exception. ConclusionMultiple random model generations, followed by consensus selection of regional brain substrates, produced signature models that replicated model fits to outcome and outperformed other commonly used measures. Robust biomarkers of cognition and everyday function may be achievable by this method. FundingThis project was funded by R01 AG052132 (NIH/NIA)

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
17.6%
2
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
10.5%
3
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
4
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.3%
6
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.4%
11
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
13
Neuroimage: Reports
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
17
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.1%
21
Brain Imaging and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%