Back

Dissecting the Genetic Architecture of Carbon Partitioning in Sorghum using Multiscale Phenotypes

Boatwright, J. L.; Sapkota, S. K.; Myers, M.; Kumar, N.; Cox, A.; Kresovich, S.

2022-02-19 plant biology
10.1101/2022.02.16.480719 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Carbon partitioning in plants may be viewed as a dynamic process composed of the many interactions between sources and sinks. The accumulation and distribution of fixed carbon is not dictated simply by the sink strength and number but is dependent upon the source, pathways, and interactions of the system. As such, the study of carbon partitioning through perturbations to the system or through focus on individual traits may fail to produce actionable developments or a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying this complex process. Using the recently published sorghum carbon-partitioning panel, we collected both macroscale phenotypic characteristics such as plant height, above-ground biomass, and dry weight along with microscale compositional traits to deconvolute the carbon-partitioning pathways in this multipurpose crop. Multivariate analyses of traits resulted in the identification of numerous loci associated with several distinct carbon-partitioning traits, which putatively regulate sugar content, manganese homeostasis, and nitrate transportation. Using a multivariate adaptive shrinkage approach, we identified several loci associated with multiple traits suggesting that pleiotropic and/or interactive effects may positively influence multiple carbon-partitioning traits, or these overlaps may represent molecular switches mediating basal carbon allocating or partitioning networks. Conversely, we also identify a carbon tradeoff where reduced lignin content is associated with increased sugar content. The results presented here support previous studies demonstrating the convoluted nature of carbon partitioning in sorghum and emphasize the importance of taking a holistic approach to the study of carbon partitioning by utilizing multiscale phenotypes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.4%
2
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.0%
4
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
6
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
7
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
11
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
12
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
15
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
17
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
18
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%
24
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
25
Plant and Cell Physiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%