Back

Mask up! Testing strategies to increase mask usage in Kenya

Egger, D.; Jakubowski, A.; Nekesa, C.; Walker, M.

2022-02-17 public and global health
10.1101/2022.02.16.22270815 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCOVID-19 continues to pose a major threat to countries around the world, and non-pharmaceutical interventions such as social distancing and face coverings remain important to reduce transmission, especially in settings with low vaccination rates. Despite a nationwide mask mandate in Kenya during the pandemic, proper masking remained low in Siaya County. We conducted a pilot study with the Siaya County Ministry of Health to improve mask adoption within Ugunja subcounty, and present initial findings on mask usage effects. MethodsThe study took place across 72 villages in Ugunja subcounty, which were randomly assigned to receive: (i) free mask and education on mask usage; (ii) only education on mask usage; or (iii) no mask or education by community health workers. A "role model" intervention was also cross-randomized across half of the villages, along with SMS messages reinforcing a variety of messages around masking. The intervention was administered in January 2021. Data collection was done via phone survey and direct observation of mask usage. FindingsPreliminary analysis of the pilot study suggests providing free face masks may improve compliance, particularly in settings with higher COVID-19 risks. Two weeks to three months after the intervention, the free mask and education arm increased directly-observed correct mask usage by 3.1 percentage points (95% confidence interval 1.9, 6.0) on a control mean of 6.8 percent. Some treatment arms also improved COVID-19 knowledge and mask attitudes. InterpretationInterventions designed to increase adoption of health measures can be successful, but behavioral change is challenging and may require more intensive treatment.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.