Back

Validation of the RT-LAMP assay in a large cohort of nasopharyngeal swab samples shows that it is a useful screening method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 and its VOC variants

Cisneros-Villanueva, M.; Blancas, S. S.; Cedro-Tanda, A.; Rios-Romero, M.; Hurtado-Cordova, E.; Almaraz-Rojas, O.; Ortiz-Soriano, D. R.; Alvarez-Hernandez, V.; Arriaga-Guzman, I. E.; Tolentino-Garcia, L.; Sanchez-Vizcarra, A.; Lozada-Rodriguez, L. F.; Peralta-Arrieta, I.; Perez-Aquino, J. E.; Andonegui-Elguera, M. A.; Cendejas-Orozco, M.; Mendoza-Vargas, A.; Reyes-Grajeda, J. P.; Campos-Romero, A.; Alcantar-Fernandez, J.; Moreno-Camacho, J. L.; Gallegos-Rodriguez, J.; Esparza-Luna-Ruiz, M.; Ortiz-Ramirez, J.; Benitez-Gonzalez, M.; Uribe-Figueroa, L.; Angulo, O.; Ruiz, R.; Herrera, L. A.; Hidal

2022-02-17 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2022.02.15.22270954 medRxiv
Show abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is challenging the global supply chain and equipment needed for mass testing with RT-qPCR, the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Here, we propose the RT-LAMP assay as an additional strategy for rapid virus diagnosis. However, its validation as a diagnostic method remains uncertain. In this work, we validated the RT-LAMP assay in 1,266 nasopharyngeal swab samples with confirmed diagnosis by CDC 2019-nCoV RT-qPCR. Our cohort was divided, the first (n=984) was used to evaluate two sets of oligonucleotides (S1 and S3) and the second (n=281) to determine whether RT-LAMP could detect samples with several types of variants. This assay can identify positive samples by color change or fluorescence within 40 minutes and shows high concordance with RT-qPCR in samples with CT [≤]35. Also, S1 and S3 are able to detect SARS-CoV-2 with a sensitivity of 68.4% and 65.8%, and a specificity of 98.9% and 97.1%, respectively. Furthermore, RT-LAMP assay identified 279 sequenced samples as positive (99.3% sensitivity) corresponding to the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, Epsilon, Iota, Kappa, Lambda, Mu and Omicron variants. In conclusion, RT-LAMP is able to identify SARS-CoV-2 with good sensitivity and excellent specificity, including all VOC, VOI, VUM and FMV variants.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.0%
4
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
6
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
8
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
9
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
10
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
16
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
20
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
24
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
25
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
27
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%