Hand Hygiene Products and Adverse Skin Reactions: A Comparison between Health Care and Non-Health Care Workers
Roy, S.; Saha, A. D.; Iktidar, M. A.; Tanvir, S. M. S.; Hawlader, M. D. H.; Chowdhury, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundSince December 2019, a deadly coronavirus epidemic has swept the globe. Due to the significant risk of infection, frontline health workers had to use Personal Protective Equipment, including hand hygiene products, to keep their hands hygienic. The present study aims to compare adverse skin responses between Health Care Worker (HCW) and Non-Health Care Worker (NHCW). Materials and MethodsA descriptive, cross-sectional study of HCW and NHCW throughout the country was executed. A self-structured questionnaire was utilized to gather data from 404 HCWs and 826 NHCWs during a two-month period using multistage sampling. STATA (v16) was used to analyse the data. Results41.87% of the study participants experienced adverse skin reactions, which were more prevalent among HCW (65.10%) than NHCW (30.51%). The most often reported skin condition was skin dryness (34.39%), followed by skin peeling (11.71%). Users of alcohol-based hand sanitizers (ABHS) were more likely to get itch (8.13%), whereas soap water users were more likely to suffer skin peeling (35.74%) and rash (7.46%). There was a significant (p<0.001) association between occupation and adverse skin responses, with HCW being 3.5 times more likely to have adverse skin manifestations than NHCW. ConclusionThe research showed that health care workers had a greater prevalence of skin conditions than the overall population. Hand hygiene guidelines for frontline employees should be equipped with instructions on how to protect oneself from these adverse skin manifestations, since frequent use constitutes a significant risk factor. Above all, health care professionals and the general population should be educated on good hand hygiene practices.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge and occupational practices of beauticians and barbers in the transmission of viral hepatitis: a mixed-methods study in Volta Region of Ghana 95%
- Role of ivermectin in the prevention of COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers in India: A matched case-control study 95%
- Prevalence of Ocular Trauma and Barriers to Use of Personal Protective Devices Among Welders in Hetauda, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experimental efficacy of the face shield and the mask against emitted and potentially received particles 91%
- Half Year Longitudinal Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-antibodies and Rule Compliance in German Hospital Employees 91%
- SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among healthcare workers in general hospitals and clinics in Japan 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence and determinants of evidence of silicosis and impaired lung function, among small scale tanzanite miners and the peri-mining community in northern Tanzania 93%
- Acceptability and associated factors of indoor residual spraying for Malaria control by households in Luangwa district of Zambia: A multilevel analysis 93%
- Usability and acceptability of oral fluid- and blood-based hepatitis C virus self-testing among the general population and men who have sex with men in Malaysia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 and associated risk factors among healthcare workers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa 93%
- The Use of Machine Learning in Occupational Risk Communication for Healthcare Workers – Protocol for scoping review 92%
- High risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among frontline healthcare workers in Northeast Brazil: a respondent-driven sampling approach 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.