Rapid Knowledgebase Construction and Hypotheses Generation Using Extractive Literature Search
Launer-Wachs, S.; Taub-Tabib, H.; Goldberg, Y.; Shamay, Y.
Show abstract
As knowledgebases become increasingly important for structuring vast amounts of scientific knowledge and making it accessible to researchers, their construction entails expensive multi-year projects involving teams of bio-curators, computer scientists, or both. This restricts the coverage of existing knowledgebases to a limited set of popular topics, leaving a long tail of more specialized interests uncovered. We present a methodology and a supporting tool to allow individual researchers or small teams, without background in bio-curation or computer science, to mine the scientific literature and construct ad-hoc, personalized, and literature-anchored knowledgebases, that are tailored around their specific research interests and support their scientific goals. The time investment involved in creating a knowledgebase ranges from a few hours to a few weeks, depending on the desired coverage and accuracy. We demonstrate the methodology by constructing knowledgebases for different purposes: a high-level overview of challenges and controversies in a field (the cancer frontiers knowledgebase); a mapping of main concepts and interactions in a field, to support lab-internal hypothesis generation (tissue engineering and regeneration, cancer surgery and radiotherapy knowledgebases); and a comprehensive and accurate knowledgebase designated as an online up-to-date resource for the wider research community (the cell specific drug delivery knowledgebase). In each case we show how the structured knowledgebase, coupled with effective visualizations, facilitates effective data exploration, hypothesis generation and meta-analysis. We implement the method as part of an open source web-based platform for knowledgebase construction, available publicly and freely at https://spike-kbc.apps.allenai.org.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- New implementation of data standards for AI research in precision oncology. Experience from EuCanImage 93%
- KGML-xDTD: A Knowledge Graph-based Machine Learning Framework for Drug Treatment Prediction and Mechanism Description 91%
- Strategies and Techniques for Quality Control and Semantic Enrichment with Multimodal Data: A Case Study in Colorectal Cancer with eHDPrep 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- CROssBAR: Comprehensive Resource of Biomedical Relations with Deep Learning Applications and Knowledge Graph Representations 95%
- CNCDatabase: a database of non-coding cancer drivers 91%
- OmicsFootPrint: a framework to integrate and interpret multi-omics data using circular images and deep neural networks 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.