Back

Assessment of Genetic Susceptibility to Multiple Primary Cancers through Whole-Exome Sequencing in Two Large Multi-Ancestry Studies

Cavazos, T. B.; Kachuri, L.; Graff, R. E.; Nierenberg, J. L.; Thai, K. K.; Alexeeff, S.; Van Den Eeden, S.; Corley, D. A.; Kushi, L. H.; Hoffmann, T. J.; Ziv, E.; Habel, L.; Jorgenson, E.; Sakoda, L. C.; Witte, J. S.

2022-02-15 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2022.02.11.22270688 medRxiv
Show abstract

Up to one of every six individuals diagnosed with one cancer will be diagnosed with a second primary cancer in their lifetime. Genetic factors contributing to the development of multiple primary cancers, beyond known cancer syndromes, have been underexplored. To characterize genetic susceptibility to multiple cancers, we conducted a pan-cancer, whole-exome sequencing study of individuals drawn from two large prospective cohorts (6,429 cases, 165,853 controls). We created two groupings of individuals diagnosed with multiple primary cancers: 1) an overall combined set with at least two cancers across any of 36 organ sites; and 2) cancer-specific sets defined by an index cancer at one of 16 organ sites with at least 50 cases from each study population. We then investigated whether variants identified from exome sequencing were associated with these sets of multiple cancer cases in comparison to individuals with one and, separately, no cancers. We identified 22 variant-phenotype associations, 10 of which have not been previously discovered and were significantly overrepresented among individuals with multiple cancers, compared to those with a single cancer. Overall, we describe variants and genes that may play a fundamental role in the development of multiple primary cancers and improve our understanding of shared mechanisms underlying carcinogenesis. Further investigation of these findings may lead to new screening strategies for individuals at risk for multiple primary cancers.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.