Back

Effects of substrate on shrimp growth, water quality and bacterial community in the biofloc system nursing Penaeus vannamei postlarvae

Huang, H.-H.; Li, C.-Y.; Lei, Y.-J.; Kuang, W.-Q.; Zhou, B.-L.; Zou, W.-S.; Yang, P.-H.

2022-08-14 zoology
10.1101/2022.02.08.479639 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of substrate on water quality, shrimp growth and bacterial community in the biofloc system with a salinity of 5{per thousand}. Two treatments, biofloc system with (sB) or without (nB) addition of elastic solid packing filler (nylon) as substrate, were set up. Penaeus vannamei postlarvae (PL, ~ stage 15) were stocked at a density of 4000 PL m-3 in each treatment with triplicates for a 28-days culture experiment, taking glucose as carbon source (C:N 15:1). Results showed that the survival rate (96.3{+/-}3.6%), FCR (0.76{+/-}0.06) and productivity (1.54{+/-}0.12 kg m-3) in sB treatment were significantly better than those in nB treatment (81.0{+/-}7.1%, 0.98{+/-}0.08 and 1.14{+/-}0.09 kg m-3, P<0.05). All water parameters were in the recommended ranges. Substrate showed significant effect on TAN, TSS, turbidity, biofloc volume, pH and carbonate alkalinity (P < 0.05). Actinobacteria (4.0-22.7%), Bacteroidetes (10.4-33.5%), Firmicutes (0.2-11.2%), Planctomycetes (4.0-14.9%) and Proteobacteria (29.4-59.0%) were the most dominant phyla for both treatments. However, the bacterial community in sB treatment showed to be significantly different from that in nB treatment (Jaccard distance 0.94{+/-}0.01, P=0.001). Substrate showed significant effects on Shannon, Heip, Pielou and Simpson index, as well as relative abundances of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Planctomycetes (P < 0.05). The results suggested that addition of substrate affected the shrimp growth, water quality and bacterial community in the biofloc system nursing P. vannamei PL with a 5{per thousand} salinity.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.