Unsupervised encoding selection through ensemble pruning for biomedical classification
Spaenig, S.; Michel, A.; Heider, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundOwing to the rising levels of multi-resistant pathogens, antimicrobial peptides, an alternative strategy to classic antibiotics, got more attention. A crucial part is thereby the costly identification and validation. With the ever-growing amount of annotated peptides, researchers leverage artificial intelligence to circumvent the cumbersome, wet-lab-based identification and automate the detection of promising candidates. However, the prediction of a peptides function is not limited to antimicrobial efficiency. To date, multiple studies successfully classified additional properties, e.g., antiviral or cell-penetrating effects. In this light, ensemble classifiers are employed aiming to further improve the prediction. Although we recently presented a workflow to significantly diminish the initial encoding choice, an entire unsupervised encoding selection, considering various machine learning models, is still lacking. ResultsWe developed a workflow, automatically selecting encodings and generating classifier ensembles by employing sophisticated pruning methods. We observed that the Pareto frontier pruning is a good method to create encoding ensembles for the datasets at hand. In addition, encodings combined with the Decision Tree classifier as the base model are often superior. However, our results also demonstrate that none of the ensemble building techniques is outstanding for all datasets. ConclusionThe workflow conducts multiple pruning methods to evaluate ensemble classifiers composed from a wide range of peptide encodings and base models. Consequently, researchers can use the workflow for unsupervised encoding selection and ensemble creation. Ultimately, the extensible workflow can be used as a plugin for the PEPTIDE REACToR, further establishing it as a versatile tool in the domain.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- VICTOR: A visual analytics web application for comparing cluster sets 95%
- Employing Machine Learning Techniques to Detect Protein-Protein Interaction: A Survey, Experimental, and Comparative Evaluations 95%
- AE-LGBM: Sequence-Based Novel Approach To Detect Interacting Protein Pairs via Ensemble of Autoencoder and LightGBM. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging Permutation Testing to Assess Confidence in Positive-Unlabeled Learning Applied to High-Dimensional Biological Datasets 95%
- A Comparison of Embedding Aggregation Strategies in Drug-Target Interaction Prediction 95%
- Multi-Head Attention-based U-Nets for Predicting Protein Domain Boundaries Using 1D Sequence Features and 2D Distance Maps 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- DeLUCS: Deep Learning for Unsupervised Clustering of DNA Sequences 95%
- Improving prediction of drug-target interactions based on fusing multiple features with data balancing and feature selection techniques 95%
- A cautionary tale about properly vetting datasets used in supervised learning predicting metabolic pathway involvement 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing Random Forest self-reproducibility for optimal short biomarker signature discovery 96%
- Blood-based transcriptomic signature panel identification for cancer diagnosis: Benchmarking of feature extraction methods 95%
- Feature selection with vector-symbolic architectures: a case study on microbial profiles of shotgun metagenomic samples of colorectal cancer 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.