Strategies to support early- and mid-career cardiovascular researchers to thrive
Thomas, E. E.; Chapman, N.; De Camargo Catapan, S.; Climie, R.; Wise, S.; Mirabato Colafella, K. M.; Picone, D.; Inglis, S.; Tan, J.; Wu, J.; Blekkenhorst, L.; Calkin, A.; Marques, F.
Show abstract
BackgroundRecent evidence indicates that high numbers of cardiovascular (CV) researchers have considered leaving the research and academic sector due to lack of job security and low funding success. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop solutions to support the retention of early- and mid-career researchers (EMCRs). Here, we aimed to explore the current challenges faced by CV EMCRs, identify solutions to support their career progression and retention, and define a pathway forward to provide a thriving CV EMCR culture in Australia. MethodsAustralian CV EMCRs (<15 years post-PhD; n=34) participated in 90-minute online focus groups (n=7) to examine current CV research culture, equity in career progression and solutions (including a timeframe and level of priority) to overcome challenges to career success. Participants were purposefully grouped based on socio-demographic information, including years post-PhD, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation and caring responsibilities. ResultsParticipants identified that current metrics only rewarded a narrow set of successes and did not support a collaborative culture. The current appraisal of career disruption in grant applications was identified as inadequate to address underrepresented researchers, such as women and those from culturally-diverse backgrounds. EMCRs proposed 92 solutions aimed at interpersonal, organisational or external levels, with capacity building and equitable opportunities as key focus areas. ConclusionPragmatic, cost-effective and implementable opportunities were identified to support the career progression of CV EMCRs to create a more sustainable, equitable and supportive workforce. This information can be used to strategically engage key stakeholders to enable CV EMCRs to thrive.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 94%
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 94%
- The impact of the first wave of COVID-19 on those with lifelong conditions: a case study of congenital heart disease 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiology researchers' practices and perceived barriers related to open science: an international cross-sectional survey 94%
- Language Matters -Representations of ‘heart failure’ in English discourse: a large-scale linguistic study 90%
- Machine learning approaches to predict 30-day mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention in an Australian population 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- An emerging TIMER-2C framework for addressing barriers to research culture and productivity among local healthcare providers in the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative study and modified Delphi approach 93%
- Stakeholder perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to integrating cardiovascular disease and diabetes management at primary care in Kenya 93%
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge and motivations of training in peer review: an international cross-sectional survey 94%
- Dissemination and Stakeholder Engagement Practices Among Dissemination & Implementation Scientists: Results from an Online Survey 93%
- Using Stakeholder Insights to Enhance Engagement in PhD Professional Development 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Following the science? Views from scientists on government advisory boards during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study in five European countries 94%
- Public engagement and crowdfunding for health research: A global qualitative evidence synthesis and TDR pilot 92%
- Designathons in Health Research: A Global Systematic Review 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.