Back

A Practical Model For Early Identification Of Prospective High Need High Cost Patients

Golan Cohen, A.; Shlomo, V.; Isaacson, A.; Avramovich, E.; Merzon, E.

2022-02-06 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2022.02.04.22270056 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHigh Need-High Cost (HNHC) patients are those who experience poor health outcomes and high health care costs. Early identification may improve outcomes and lower costs. AimDevelopment of a model using retrospective data to identify patients at risk for becoming HNHC patients, in order to efficaciously plan interventions. MethodsData from a large Israeli Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) that includes 488,615 clients above the age of 21 were examined. Multivariate linear regression models were developed using 2012-2016 health expenditure as a dependent variable. ResultsThe number of yearly purchases of medications for chronic disorders, yearly outpatient visits, yearly emergency department and hospital admissions and the last measured HgA1c level were highly predictive of increased expenditure over a five-year period. Each of these indicators has a different coefficient of influence. ConclusionsWe developed a predictive model, based on easily obtained data from electronic medical records that enabled us to identify a population at risk for becoming HNHC in the next five years, a time window allows for intervention. Further research is needed to evaluate whether this is an early enough stage to implement pro-active intervention in the primary care setting. Trial registrationretrospectively registered. HIGHLIGHTSIn this study, we developed a numerical point system calculator, to indicate a risk score for health deterioration within 5 years of patients, by using numerical indicators existing in standard EMR data. The indicators introduced into this calculated risk can guide healthcare providers to the needed areas of intervention. The display of indicators also promotes optimization of care management and continuity of care. This risk score is expected to focus the attention of primary care teams on the population that will benefit most from it, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of specific interventions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.2%
3
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.8%
5
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
6
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
7
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
12
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
13
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
14
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
16
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
17
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%