Back

Inference of causal relationships based on the genetics of cardiometabolic traits and conditions unique to females in >50,000 participants

Xiao, B.; Edwards, D. R. V.; Lucas, A.; Drivas, T.; Gray, K.; Keating, B.; Weng, C.; Jarvik, G. P.; Hakonarson, H.; Kottyan, L.; Elhadad, N.; Regeneron Genetics Center, ; Wei, W.-Q.; Luo, Y.; Kim, D.; Ritchie, M.; Verma, S. S.

2022-02-04 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2022.02.02.22269844 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCardiometabolic diseases are highly comorbid and associated with poor health outcomes. However, the investigation of the relationship between the genetic predisposition to cardiometabolic diseases with the risk of conditions unique to females such as breast cancer, endometriosis and pregnancy-related complications is highly understudied. This study aimed to estimate the cross-trait genetic overlap and influence of genetic burden of cardiometabolic traits on health conditions unique to females. MethodsWe obtained data for female participants in the Penn Medicine BioBank (PMBB; 21,837 samples) and the electronic MEdical Records and GEnomics (eMERGE; 49,171 samples) network. We examined the relationship between four cardiometabolic phenotypes (body mass index (BMI), coronary artery disease (CAD), type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension (through blood pressure measurements)) and 23 female health conditions by performing four analyses: 1) Cross-trait genetic correlation analyses to compare genetic architecture. 2) Polygenic risk scores (PRS)-based association tests to characterize shared genetic effects on disease risk. 3) Mendelian randomization (MR) for significant associations to assess cross-trait causal relationships. 4) Chronology analyses to visualize the timeline of events unique to groups of females with high and low genetic burden for cardiometabolic traits and highlight the disease prevalence in risk groups by age. ResultsWe observed high genetic correlation among cardiometabolic and female health conditions. PRS meta-analysis identified 29 significant associations reflecting potential shared biology among common cardiometabolic phenotypes and female health conditions. Significant associations include PRSBMI with endometrial cancer and polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), PRSCAD with breast cancer, and the PRST2D with gestational diabetes and PCOS. Mendelian randomization provided additional evidence of independent causal effects between T2D and gestational diabetes and CAD and with breast cancer. Our results reflected inverse association between PRSCAD and breast cancer. Lastly, as visualized from chronology analyses, individuals with high PRS are also more likely to develop conditions such as PCOS and gestational hypertension at earlier ages. ConclusionsPolygenic susceptibility to cardiometabolic traits is associated with conditions unique to females. Several of these associations are likely to result from the complex pathophysiology of cardiometabolic risk, and others may reflect potential pleiotropic effects that go beyond cardiometabolic health in females.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.3%
3
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.9%
6
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
8
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
10
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
14
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
19
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
24
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
25
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%