Emergency department utilization and hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions among unattached people actively seeking a primary care provider during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study
Marshall, E. G.; Stock, D.; Buote, R.; Andrew, M. K.; Breton, M.; Cossette, B.; Green, M. E.; Isenor, J. E.; Mathews, M.; Lenskjold, A.; MacKenzie, A.; Martin-Misener, R.; McDougall, B.; Mooney, M.; Moritz, L. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundPrimary care (PC) attachment improves healthcare access and prevention and management of chronic conditions. Yet, growing proportions of Canadians are unattached, signing-up on provincial waitlists. Understanding variations in healthcare utilization during COVID-19, and among potentially vulnerable unattached patients, is needed. This study compares emergency department (ED) utilization and hospitalization among those on and off a provincial PC waitlist, during the first two waves of COVID-19. MethodsWaitlist and administrative health data were linked to describe persons ever/never on the waitlist between January 1, 2017, and December 24, 2020. ED utilization and ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) hospitalization rates by current waitlist status were quantified from physician claims and hospitalization data. Relative differences during COVID-19 first and second waves were compared with the previous year. ResultsDuring the study period, 100,867 Nova Scotians (10.1%) were on the waitlist. Those on the waitlist had higher ED utilization and ACSC hospitalizations. ED utilization was higher overall for individuals [≥]65 years and females; lowest during first two COVID-19 waves; and differed more by waitlist status for those <65 years. ED contacts and ACSC hospitalizations decreased during COVID-19 relative to the previous year, and for ED utilization this difference was more pronounced for those on the waitlist. InterpretationNova Scotians seeking PC attachment utilize hospital-based services more frequently than those not on the waitlist. Both groups had lower utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic than the year before. The degree to which forgone services produces downstream health burden remains to be seen.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in patient attachment to an aging primary care workforce: a population-based serial cross-sectional study in Ontario, Canada 94%
- Clinical, Behavioral and Social Factors Associated with Racial Disparities in Hospitalized and Ambulatory COVID-19 Patients from an Integrated Health Care System in Georgia 93%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term Public Healthcare Burden Associated with Intimate Partner Violence among Canadian Women: A Cohort Study 92%
- A novel methodology to measure waiting times for community-based specialist care in a public healthcare system 90%
- Understanding the influence of leadership, organisation, and policy on delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in General Practice use and costs with COVID-19 and telehealth initiatives 91%
- Suspected COVID-19 in primary care: how GP records contribute to understanding differences in prevalence by ethnicity. 91%
- Primary care transformation in Scotland: a comparison two cross-sectional national surveys of general practitioners’ views in 2018 and 2023 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.