Simple and economical RNA extraction and storage packets for viral detection from serum or plasma
Hernandez, S.; Cardozo, F.; Myers, D. R.; Rojas, A.; Waggoner, J.
Show abstract
RNA extraction is an essential step for detection and surveillance of common viral pathogens. Currently, sample processing and RNA extraction are costly and rely on proprietary materials that are difficult to acquire, maintain, and safely discard in low-resource settings. We developed an economical RNA extraction and storage protocol that eliminates the use of instrumentation, expensive materials, and cold chain requirements. Through an iterative process, we optimized viral lysis and RNA binding to and elution from glass fiber membranes. Protocol changes were evaluated by testing eluates in virus-specific real-time RT-PCRs (rRT-PCRs). Efficient, non-toxic viral lysis was achieved with a sucrose buffer including KCl, proteinase K and carrier RNA. Glass fiber membranes demonstrated concentration-dependent RNA binding of three arthropod-borne RNA viruses (arboviruses): dengue, chikungunya and Oropouche. Membrane binding was significantly increased in an acidic arginine binding buffer. For the clinical evaluation, 36 dengue virus (DENV)-positive serum samples were extracted in duplicate in the optimized protocol and results were compared to a commercial method. DENV RNA was successfully extracted from 71/72 replicates (98.6%) in the extraction packets, and rRT-PCR Ct values correlated between the techniques. Five clinical samples were selected to evaluate ambient-temperature storage up to 7 days on dried glass fiber membranes. DENV RNA was stable at 1, 3 and 7 days post extraction, with a mean difference in eluate RNA concentration of 0.14 log10 copies/L. At a cost of $0.08 /sample, RNA extraction and storage packets address key limitations to available protocols and may increase capacity for molecular detection of RNA viruses.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Inactivation analysis of SARS-CoV-2 by specimen transport media, nucleic acid extraction reagents, detergents and fixatives 96%
- Analytical and Clinical Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Detection 95%
- Validation and multi-site deployment of a lyophilized qRT-PCR reagent for the molecular diagnosis of avian influenza and rabies in Sub-Saharan African regions 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation and Clinical Validation of Monkeypox Virus Real-Time PCR Assays 95%
- Multicenter benchmarking of short and long read wet lab protocols for clinical viral metagenomics 95%
- Is the glass half full? Extraction-free RT-LAMP to detect SARS-CoV-2 is less sensitive but highly specific compared to standard RT-PCR in 101 samples 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen–Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19 95%
- Choosing the right tool for the job: A comprehensive assessment of serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 as surrogates for authentic virus neutralization 94%
- Detection of Mpox and other Orthopoxviruses using a Lateral Flow Device as a Point of Care diagnostic. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of saline, PBS and a locally produced VTM at varying storage conditions to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus by qRT-PCR 96%
- An international, interlaboratory ring trial confirms the feasibility of an open-source, extraction-less “direct” RT-qPCR method for reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples 96%
- Sequencing SARS-CoV-2 from Antigen Tests 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.