Back

A model-based approach to improve intranasal sprays for respiratory viral infections

Basu, S.; Akash, M. M. H.; Lao, Y.; Balivada, P. A.; Ato, P.; Ka, N. K.; Mituniewicz, A.; Silfen, Z.; Suman, J.; Chakravarty, A.; Joseph-McCarthy, D.

2022-01-28 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2022.01.26.22269854 medRxiv
Show abstract

Drug delivery for viral respiratory infections, such as SARS-CoV-2, can be enhanced significantly by targeting the nasopharynx, which is the dominant initial infection site in the upper airway, for example by nasal sprays. However, under the standard recommended spray usage protocol ("Current Use", or CU), the nozzle enters the nose almost vertically, resulting in sub-optimal deposition of drug droplets at the nasopharynx. Using computational fluid dynamics simulations in two anatomic nasal geometries, along with experimental validation of the generic findings in a different third subject, we have identified a new "Improved Use" (or, IU) spray protocol. It entails pointing the spray bottle at a shallower angle (almost horizontally), aiming slightly toward the cheeks. We have simulated the performance of this protocol for conically injected spray droplet sizes of 1 - 24 m, at two breathing rates: 15 and 30 L/min. The lower flowrate corresponds to resting breathing and follows a viscous-laminar model; the higher rate, standing in for moderate breathing conditions, is turbulent and is tracked via Large Eddy Simulation. The results show that (a) droplets sized between [~] 6 - 14 m are most efficient at direct landing over the nasopharyngeal viral infection hot-spot; and (b) targeted drug delivery via IU outperforms CU by approximately 2 orders-of-magnitude, under the two tested inhalation conditions. Also quite importantly, the improved delivery strategy, facilitated by the IU protocol, is found to be robust to small perturbations in spray direction, underlining the practical utility of this simple change in nasal spray administration protocol.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
15.4%
2
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
4
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.5%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
7
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.0%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.9%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
18
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.8%
28
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%