Back

A model-based approach to improve intranasal sprays for respiratory viral infections

Basu, S.; Akash, M. M. H.; Lao, Y.; Balivada, P. A.; Ato, P.; Ka, N. K.; Mituniewicz, A.; Silfen, Z.; Suman, J.; Chakravarty, A.; Joseph-McCarthy, D.

2022-01-28 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2022.01.26.22269854 medRxiv
Show abstract

Drug delivery for viral respiratory infections, such as SARS-CoV-2, can be enhanced significantly by targeting the nasopharynx, which is the dominant initial infection site in the upper airway, for example by nasal sprays. However, under the standard recommended spray usage protocol ("Current Use", or CU), the nozzle enters the nose almost vertically, resulting in sub-optimal deposition of drug droplets at the nasopharynx. Using computational fluid dynamics simulations in two anatomic nasal geometries, along with experimental validation of the generic findings in a different third subject, we have identified a new "Improved Use" (or, IU) spray protocol. It entails pointing the spray bottle at a shallower angle (almost horizontally), aiming slightly toward the cheeks. We have simulated the performance of this protocol for conically injected spray droplet sizes of 1 - 24 m, at two breathing rates: 15 and 30 L/min. The lower flowrate corresponds to resting breathing and follows a viscous-laminar model; the higher rate, standing in for moderate breathing conditions, is turbulent and is tracked via Large Eddy Simulation. The results show that (a) droplets sized between [~] 6 - 14 m are most efficient at direct landing over the nasopharyngeal viral infection hot-spot; and (b) targeted drug delivery via IU outperforms CU by approximately 2 orders-of-magnitude, under the two tested inhalation conditions. Also quite importantly, the improved delivery strategy, facilitated by the IU protocol, is found to be robust to small perturbations in spray direction, underlining the practical utility of this simple change in nasal spray administration protocol.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.6%
2
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
3
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.7%
4
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
5
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.3%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
11
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
13
ERJ Open Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.2%
15
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
16
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
18
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
19
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Journal of Controlled Release
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
23
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
24
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
25
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
28
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
30
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.6%