Mitigating isolation: further comparing the effect of LFD testing for early release from self-isolation for COVID-19 cases
Bays, D.; Whiteley, T.; Williams, H.; Finnie, T. J. R.; Gent, N.
Show abstract
In a recent paper, we described how lateral flow device (LFD) testing might be used to reduce the amount of excess time individuals spend in isolation following confirmation of a COVID-19 infection. Through the work presented here, we look to expand upon this and explore in more detail the benefit that such an approach might provide. We use our previously described model to study scenarios through the metrics "proportion released still infectious", "excess time spent in isolation" (time isolated while no longer infectious), and "time spent infectious after early release". We also look to consider the effect on these metrics by comparing values obtained when a single negative LFD test is required for early release, versus requiring two and three sequential negative LFD tests. Results show that jointly employing self-isolation and LFD testing may deliver sizeable reductions to the proportion of individuals being release while still infection, the average amount of excess time spent in isolation by those no longer a public health threat, and the average amount of time spent infectious by those released early. These effects considered in conjunction could provide a considerable decrease in the public health risk posed by still infectious individuals being released back into the population by actively monitoring their infection status throughout their isolation period. Such an approach could also help lighten the impact incurred on the individual by reducing the amount of time spent in isolation while posing no further public health risk, in addition to alleviating pressures on the economy and in healthcare settings caused by mass isolation in times of high prevalence.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The effectiveness of Non Pharmaceutical Interventions in reducing the outcomes of the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK, an observational and modelling study 96%
- Screening plans for SARS-CoV-2 based on sampling and rotation: an example in the school setting 96%
- Estimating the impact of interventions against COVID-19: from lockdown to vaccination 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimizing testing for COVID-19 in India 96%
- Estimation of the force of infection and infectious period of skin sores in remote Australian communities using interval-censored data 96%
- Modelling to explore the potential impact of asymptomatic human infections on transmission and dynamics of African sleeping sickness 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- An evaluation of educational institutions safe reopening strategies for in-person classes amid the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Effectiveness of Second Wave COVID-19 Response Strategies in Australia 95%
- Model Based Estimation of the SARS-CoV-2 Immunization Level in Austria and Consequences for Herd Immunity Effects 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling testing and response strategies for COVID-19 outbreaks in remote Australian Aboriginal communities 95%
- Preventing a cluster from becoming a new wave in settings with zero community COVID-19 cases 95%
- Modelling the impact of tuberculosis preventive therapy: the importance of disease progression assumptions 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Human behaviour, NPI and mobility reduction effects on COVID-19 transmission in different countries of the world 95%
- Modelling a potential zoonotic spillover event of H5N1 influenza 94%
- Timely Epidemic Monitoring in the Presence of Reporting Delays: Anticipating the COVID-19 Surge in New York City, September 2020 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.