Genetic regulation of human aortic smooth muscle cell gene expression and splicing predict causal coronary artery disease genes
Aherrahrou, R.; Lue, D.; Perry, R. N.; Aberra, Y. T.; Khan, M. D.; Soh, J. Y.; Ord, T.; Singha, P.; Gilani, H.; Benavente, E. D.; Wong, D.; Hinkle, J.; Ma, L.; Sheynkman, G. M.; den Ruijter, H. H.; Miller, C. L.; Bjorkegren, J. L. M.; Kaikkonen, M. U.; Civelek, M.
Show abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Recent meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified over 175 loci associated with CAD. The majority of these loci are in non-coding regions and are predicted to regulate gene expression. Given that vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) play critical roles in the development and progression of CAD, we hypothesized that a subset of the CAD GWAS risk loci are associated with the regulation of transcription in distinct SMC phenotypes. Here, we measured gene expression in SMCs isolated from the ascending aortas of 151 ethnically diverse heart transplant donors in quiescent or proliferative conditions and calculated the association of their expression and splicing with [~]6.3 million imputed single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers across the genome. We identified 4,910 expression and 4,412 splice quantitative trait loci (sQTL) that represent regions of the genome associated with transcript abundance and splicing. 3,660 of the eQTLs had not been observed in the publicly available Genotype-Tissue Expression dataset. Further, 29 and 880 of the eQTLs were SMC- and sex-specific, respectively. To identify the effector transcript(s) regulated by CAD GWAS loci, we used four distinct colocalization approaches and identified 84 eQTL and 164 sQTLs that colocalized with CAD loci, highlighting the importance of genetic regulation of mRNA splicing as a molecular mechanism for CAD genetic risk. Notably, 20% and 35% of the eQTLs were unique to quiescent or proliferative SMCs, respectively. Two CAD loci colocalized with a SMC sex-specific eQTL (AL160313.1 and TERF2IP) and another locus colocalized with SMC-specific eQTL (ALKBH8). Also, 27% and 37% of the sQTLs were unique to quiescent or proliferative SMCs, respectively. The most significantly associated CAD locus, 9p21, was an sQTL for the long non-coding RNA CDKN2B-AS1, also known as ANRIL, in proliferative SMCs. Collectively, these results provide evidence for the molecular mechanisms of genetic susceptibility to CAD in distinct SMC phenotypes.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fine mapping spatiotemporal mechanisms of genetic variants underlying cardiac traits and disease 97%
- Chromatin interaction maps of human arterioles reveal new mechanisms for the genetic regulation of blood pressure 97%
- Transferability of genetic loci and polygenic scores for cardiometabolic traits in British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Integration of genetic fine-mapping and multi-omics data reveals candidate effector genes for hypertension 97%
- Interaction molecular QTL mapping discovers cellular and environmental modifiers of genetic regulatory effects 96%
- Association of Structural Variation with Cardiometabolic Traits in Finns 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell-specific chromatin landscape of human coronary artery resolves regulatory mechanisms of disease risk 98%
- Deep learning enables genetic analysis of the human thoracic aorta 97%
- Large scale genome-wide association study in a Japanese population identified 45 novel susceptibility loci for 22 diseases 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implicating genes, pleiotropy and sexual dimorphism at blood lipid loci through multi-ancestry meta-analysis 95%
- Genetic effects of sequence-conserved enhancer-like elements on human complex traits 94%
- Prime Editing in Mice Reveals the Essentiality of a Single Base in Driving Tissue-Specific Gene Expression 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.