Back

Ligand-independent modulation of GIPR signaling by splice variants

Wang, M.-W.; Hang, K.; Shao, L.; Zhou, Q.; Zhao, F.; Dai, A.; Cai, X.; Stevens, R. C.; Yang, D.

2022-01-24 molecular biology
10.1101/2022.01.24.477496 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) is a potential drug target for metabolic disorders. It works with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) and glucagon receptor (GCGR) in humans to maintain glucose homeostasis. Unlike the other two receptors, GIPR has at least 7 reported (EMBL-EBI, 2022; NCBI, 2022a, 2022b) splice variants (SVs) with previously undefined functions. To explore their roles in endogenous peptide mediated GIPR signaling, we investigated the outcome of co-expressing each of the four SVs in question with GIPR in terms of ligand binding, cAMP accumulation, Gs activation, {beta}-arrestin recruitment and cell surface localization. The effects of these SVs on intracellular cAMP responses modulated by receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) were also studied. It was found that while SVs of GIPR neither bound to the hormone nor affected its signal transduction per se, they differentially regulated GIPR-mediated cAMP and {beta}-arrestin responses. Specifically, SV1 and SV4 were preferable to Gs signaling, SV3 was biased towards {beta}-arrestin recruitment, whereas SV2 was inactive on both pathways. In the presence of RAMPs, only SV1 and SV4 synergized the repressive action of RAMP3 on GIP-elicited cAMP production. The results suggest a new form of signal bias that is constitutive and ligand-independent, thereby expanding our knowledge of biased signaling beyond pharmacological manipulation (i.e., ligand specific) as well as constitutive and ligand-dependent (e.g., SV1 of the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor).

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.