Rapid Selectivity to Natural Images Across Layers of Primate V1
Chen, X.; Zhu, S.; Bai, K.; Xia, R.; Kong, N. C. L.; Norcia, A. M.; Moore, T.
Show abstract
Visual systems are thought to have adapted to the statistical properties of natural scenes. However, the extent to which visual neurons respond selectively to natural images, and the stage at which that selectivity emerges remains unclear. To address these questions, we recorded the visual activity of neurons in macaque V1 using high-density electrode arrays (Neuropixels), and compared neuronal responses to images presented at three levels of naturalness. We found that within 60 ms of stimulus onset, neurons in all cortical layers, including input layers 4C alpha and beta, responded more vigorously to natural images than to statistically matched naturalistic texture and noise images. The result remained when residual variations in the local image statistics were factored out. V1 neurons also showed high population and lifetime sparseness for natural images. Across the population of V1 neurons, sensitivity to natural images exceeded the sensitivity to other image categories. The results reveal a rapid and pervasive preference for natural images is present at the earliest stages of cortical processing.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct cortical populations drive multisensory modulation of segregated auditory sources 97%
- Spatial processing of limbs reveals the center-periphery bias in high level visual cortex follows a nonlinear topography 97%
- Neural evidence for boundary updating as the source of the repulsive bias in classification 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stimulus information guides the emergence of behavior related signals in primary somatosensory cortex during learning 97%
- Enhanced Behavioral Performance through Interareal Gamma and Beta Synchronization 96%
- A frontosensory circuit for visual context processing is synchronous in the theta/alpha band 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.