A scalp geometry parameter-space for optimization and implementation of conventional TMS coil placement
Jiang, Y.; Du, B.; Chen, Y.; Wei, L.; Cao, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, C.; Li, G.; Cai, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhu, C.
Show abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation efficacy is largely dependent upon coil position and orientation. A good method for describing coil placement is required for both computational optimization (planning) and actual placement (implementation). In coordinate dependent parameter-spaces (CDPs), three-dimensional coordinates are used to represent coil position and three orthogonal unit vectors are used to represent coil orientation. A CDP can precisely describe arbitrary coil placement; therefore it offers great advantage in computational optimization which checks through all possible placements. However, a neuronavigation system is usually required to accurately implement the optimized CDP parameters on a participants head. Routine clinical practice, on the other hand, often uses the International 10-20 system to describe coil placement. Although the 10-20 system can only perform modeling and placement at limited scalp landmarks, it allows the synthesis of different individuals targeting effects to find group-optimal parameters; it also allows manual placement, which is important for commonly-seen use cases without individual MRI scans and navigation devices. This study proposes a new scalp geometry based parameter-space (SGP), integrating the advantages of CDP and 10-20 methods. Our SGP 1) can quantitatively specify all possible conventional coil positions and orientations on an individuals scalp, which is important for electrical modeling and optimization, 2) maintains inter-individual correspondence, which is important for synthesizing TMS effects from different individuals and studies. 3) enables fast and simple manual implementation. Demonstration experiments were conducted to illustrate the application of an SGP-based framework for both individual and group-based optimization. A measurement experiment was performed to evaluate speed, precision and reliability of SGP-based manual implementation; results show it surpasses previous manual placement methods.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The rt-TEP tool: real-time visualization of TMS-Evoked Potential to maximize cortical activation and minimize artifacts 96%
- Designing and comparing cleaning pipelines for TMS-EEG data: a theoretical overview and practical example 95%
- A surface metric and software toolbox for EEG electrode grids in the macaque 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- TAP: Targeting and analysis pipeline for optimization and verification of coil placement in transcranial magnetic stimulation 97%
- Fast FEM-based Electric Field Calculations for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation 95%
- Optimal placement of high-channel visual prostheses in human retinotopic visual cortex 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A library for fMRI real-time processing systems in python (RTPSpy) with comprehensive online noise reduction, fast and accurate anatomical image processing, and online processing simulation 94%
- Decoding Neural Activity in Sulcal and White Matter Areas of the Brain to Accurately Predict Individual Finger Movement and Tactile Stimuli of the Human Hand 94%
- Somatotopic Arrangement of Eight Distinct Skin Areas in the Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex Derived from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.