Back

Safety and Efficacy of Navigational Bronchoscopy with Archimedes Virtual Bronchoscopic Platform in Patients with Advanced Pulmonary Disease

Verga, S. R.; Marron, R.; Criner, G.; Veselis, C.; Dass, C.; Zhao, H.

2022-01-24 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2022.01.22.22269681 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPatients with advanced lung disease who present with suspicious pulmonary nodules (SPNs) undergoing transthoracic needle aspiration pose a diagnostic challenge given risk for complications. Virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) is an alternative means to biopsy patients. Study DesignThe study was a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent VBN with the Archimedes platform. Demographic information, radiographic evidence of parenchymal lung disease and pulmonary function testing were gathered. Peri-procedure complications and clinical data on biopsy results were gathered to assist in determining both adequate tissue sample (defined if adequate specimen was obtained as per pathology/cytology report) and diagnostic yield (defined as if after further testing/CT imaging from 1 year post-procedure the diagnosis did not change). Univariate analysis was performed to determine the impact of clinical factors on diagnostic yield. ResultsNinety-six patients with 110 nodules underwent VBN. Eight-eight patients (92%) had radiographic emphysema with 56% having moderate to severe. Fourteen patients (17%) had radiographic ILD. Adequate tissue sample at time of VBN was 93%. Overall diagnostic yield in 80 patients (excluding 16 patients who were initially benign/non-diagnostic that were lost to follow-up) was 72%. Overall complication rate was 7% with 1-pneumothorax (1%), 3-significant bleeding and 3-hospitalized for respiratory failure. ConclusionIn our cohort of patients the diagnostic yield and complication rate were comparable to other studies where there were fewer patients with advanced lung disease. This data suggests that VBN-guided bronchoscopic biopsy of SPNs is a viable diagnostic option with an acceptable safety profile.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.