Back

The role of rice SOG1 and SOG1-like in DNA damage response

Nishizawa-Yokoi, A.; Motoyama, R.; Tanaka, T.; Mori, A.; Iida, K.; Toki, S.

2022-01-23 plant biology
10.1101/2022.01.21.477278 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Higher plants are constantly exposed to environmental stresses, and therefore complicated defense systems, including DNA damage response (DDR) and DNA repair systems, have developed to protect plant cells. In Arabidopsis, the transcription factor SUPPRESSOR OF GAMMA RESPONSE 1 (SOG1) has been reported to play a key role in DDR. Here, we focus on DDR in rice--thought to be a simpler system compared with Arabidopsis due to lack of induction of endocycle even under DNA damage stress. Rice SOG1 (OsSOG1) and SOG1-like (OsSGL) were identified as putative AtSOG1 orthologs with complete or partial conservation of the serine-glutamine (SQ) motifs involved in activation via phosphorylation. In addition to OsSOG1- or OsSGL-knockout mutants, OsSOG1 non-phosphorylatable mutants (OsSOG1-7A) were generated by homologous recombination-mediated gene targeting. Based on DNA damage susceptibility and transcriptome analysis using these mutants, we demonstrated that OsSOG1, but not OsSGL, plays a central role in the DDR and DNA repair. OsSOG1 regulated target genes via CTT (N)7 AAG motifs reported previously as AtSOG1 recognition sites. The loss of transcription activities and DNA damage tolerance of OsSOG1-7A was not complete compared with OsSOG1-knockout mutants, raising the possibility that another phosphorylation site might be involved in the activation of OsSOG1. Furthermore, our findings have highlighted differences in SOG1-mediated DDR between rice and Arabidopsis, especially regarding induction of cell-cycle arrest and endocycle arrest, revealing rice-specific DDR mechanisms. One sentence summaryRice transcription factor SUPPRESSOR OF GAMMA RESPONSE 1 controls DNA damage response and DNA repair through activation via phosphorylation and the direct regulation of expression of numerous genes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.3%
4
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
6
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.9%
8
Environmental and Experimental Botany
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Plant Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
11
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.9%
12
Planta
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Plant And Cell Physiology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
17
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
18
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
23
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Plant and Cell Physiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
26
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%